u yankees really are clueless re accident

External Since: May 12, 2005 Posts: 15

On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:01:58 -0700, Spike <jma.RemoveThis@snowcrest.net> wrote:

>Valid point that without accidents the rates might not be so high, but
>you must admit that people getting greedy joining up with shyster
>lawyers, compounded by juries that award judgments way out of
>proportion to the situation all have definite impacts on rates. And I
>think what Kate was saying was that people are entitled to fair and
>just compensation for a loss, but should be guided by conscience as to
>what fair and just is in their particular case. Damage repair and
>medical sure. Compensation for loss of use while repairs are made,
>sure. But claiming damage that was already there, or injuries that
>don't exist yet can't be disproved, in order to find that pot of gold
>at the end of the rainbow is way beyond just being morally wrong.
>That's just pure greed which, if nothing else, is the kind of thing
>which gives insurers the excuse, founded or not, to jack up everyone's
>rates.

what abunch of FOCTARDS
Insurance companies have had RECORD profits untill they lost it
investing in STOCK MARKET when it crashed on 911
like the rest of the yankee economy.
lmfao
last year again insurace profits were in billions
LMFAO
u yankees are tards

canada home of the free
land of the brave
alberta rules dude
no deficit and OIL

hurc ast
>
>On Thu, 12 May 2005 17:07:26 -0400, "Fao, Sean"
><enceladus311.RemoveThis@yahoo.comI-WANT-NO-SPAM> wrote:
>
  >>SVTKate wrote:
  >>
   >>> As far as taking advantage of the situation, you have got to lead with your
   >>> concience.
   >>> People that take advantage are the reason that insurance rates are so high.
   >>> If your car is repaired to pre-wreck condition and you have no physical
   >>> injuries, then why ask for more than you are entitled to, just because you
   >>> can?
  >>
  >>Maybe you and I share different views on this topic. IMHO, making up
  >>for a loss in value (assuming there is one) is more than enough reason
  >>to ask for a little more. Taking advantage of the situation isn't what
  >>makes rates high. More often than not, it's lack of attention and/or
  >>foolish behavior that causes the accident, which leads to high rates.
>
>Hey! Spikey Likes IT!
>1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok
>Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior
>Vintage 40 Wheels 16X8"
>w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A Radial 225/50ZR16

External Since: May 24, 2004 Posts: 356

<conradblack922376 DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote
> canada home of the free

and the frozen

> land of the brave

Brave? When was the last time Canada stood for ANYTHING or did the right
thing even though it wasn't the popular thing. WWII??? Actually that
wouldn't count since it WAS the popular thing then.

> alberta rules dude

Rules what? I'd rather go to Montreal, Quebec.

> no deficit and OIL

....and the worst medical coverage in the world next to the former Soviet
states (and maybe Haiti).
--
Scott W.
'66 HCS Mustang 289
'68 Ranchero 500 302
'69 Mustang Sportsroof 351W
ThunderSnake #57
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/" target="_blank">http://home.comcast.net/~vanguard92/</a>