 |
|
 |
|
Next: Bolt size
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Nov 11, 2004 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:40 pm
Post subject: hot for a Baja.... Archived from groups: alt>autos>subaru (more info?)
|
|
|
|
| HI All, I've got a case of car fever for a Baja, are there any reasons to avoid
one, or any quirks, (other than looks) that I should know about?
I'm looking at the base line model, no-turbo w/automatic, for highway use,
TIA, Mark C.
|
>> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 12, 2004 Posts: 130
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:40 pm
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I almost bought one back in Jan. Ended up with OBW instead. Here's
why
1. 2 seats in back
2. To lock rear cargo area is at least $1000
3. Worse than average reliabilbility as per Consumer Reports
If you get one go to www.crutchfield.com and spend ~$250 for a good
stereo and replacement speakers . You'll thank me. Non turbo Subarus
are not fast but are certainly not pigs. Personally I think the Baja
is doomed as it doesnt offer any advantages over other vehicles in the
line . It just doesnt serve a purpose. I fit a washing maching in the
OBW so carrying isnt a real advantage in Baja. >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 16, 2004 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:40 pm
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 12/16/04 5:31 PM, in article
20041216183152.08318.00002371.DeleteThis@mb-m04.aol.com, "Shwackman"
<shwackman.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote:
> HI All, I've got a case of car fever for a Baja, are there any reasons to
> avoid
> one, or any quirks, (other than looks) that I should know about?
> I'm looking at the base line model, no-turbo w/automatic, for highway use,
> TIA, Mark C.
Consumer Reports says the reliability of the 03 is "disappointing". All
the trouble spots they except for body integrity are given a good rating.
Body integrity must be a trouble spot.
Website is here if it helps:
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.consumerreports.org" target="_blank">http://www.consumerreports.org</a>
-----------== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.newsfeed.com" target="_blank">http://www.newsfeed.com</a> The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----= Over 100,000 Newsgroups - Unlimited Fast Downloads - 19 Servers =-----<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 05, 2004 Posts: 144
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 9:40 pm
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 16 Dec 2004 16:59:18 -0800, jabario DeleteThis @backpacker.com wrote:
>3. Worse than average reliabilbility as per Consumer Reports
Aren't the mechanicals the same as the OBW?
Barry<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 16, 2004 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:28 pm
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Shwackman" <shwackman.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041216183152.08318.00002371@mb-m04.aol.com...
> HI All, I've got a case of car fever for a Baja, are there any reasons to
> avoid
> one, or any quirks, (other than looks) that I should know about?
> I'm looking at the base line model, no-turbo w/automatic, for highway use,
> TIA, Mark C.
I have an 03 MT and it perfectly does what I bought it for.It runs
great in the snow(Northeast Vt-still haven't bought snow tires) and cruises
very nicely.On the other hand I found the AT very underpowered and I would
be hesitant to buy any non turbo in a city where quick acceleration is a
must.
As for the sounds-I got the subwoofer and the rest of the sound
package.I'd say I'm about 99.9 percent happy-but then I listen to loud R & R
not Rap.
BTW-anybody have have any luck finding a remote control starter
for their MT Subaru?Don't want to void my warranty and I'm not going to
install myself-just looking for success/horror stories.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 13, 2004 Posts: 174
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 4:40 am
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote in message
news:suc4s05637nkmjdifpigeqsk0dlem6m77q@4ax.com...
> On 16 Dec 2004 16:59:18 -0800, jabario RemoveThis @backpacker.com wrote:
>
>
> >3. Worse than average reliabilbility as per Consumer Reports
>
> Aren't the mechanicals the same as the OBW?
Indeed they are. Gotta wonder about CR sometimes though. Most of the time
they are aware of mechanical twins, but I've heard of situations where
they've given two identical cars very different ratings. Given the normally
high rating of the entire Subaru line, there would have to be massive
problems with the rear tailgate and pass through (two of the unique parts)
in order to make the overall reliability worse. Since I've never heard
anyone in the group (or anywhere else) report any Baja-specific problems, I
would have to wonder about that statement.
-Matt<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 31, 2004 Posts: 10
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 4:40 am
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <yXwwd.1072$1o1.88@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>,
"Hallraker" <hallraker79.TakeThisOut@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Bonehenge" <Keep_it_in_the_newsgroup_please.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:suc4s05637nkmjdifpigeqsk0dlem6m77q@4ax.com...
> > On 16 Dec 2004 16:59:18 -0800, jabario.TakeThisOut@backpacker.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > >3. Worse than average reliabilbility as per Consumer Reports
> >
> > Aren't the mechanicals the same as the OBW?
>
> Indeed they are. Gotta wonder about CR sometimes though. Most of the time
> they are aware of mechanical twins, but I've heard of situations where
> they've given two identical cars very different ratings. Given the normally
> high rating of the entire Subaru line, there would have to be massive
> problems with the rear tailgate and pass through (two of the unique parts)
> in order to make the overall reliability worse. Since I've never heard
> anyone in the group (or anywhere else) report any Baja-specific problems, I
> would have to wonder about that statement.
>
> -Matt
I can think of another possible explanation. Perhaps Baja buyers are
very different from Outback buyers, and either expect more of their
vehicles or treat them more harshly.
David, quite happy with his nearly 8 year old 1997 Legacy Outback with
almost 269,000 km on it
--
David Ryeburn
ryeburn.TakeThisOut@sfu.caz
To send e-mail, use "ca" instead of "caz".<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 12, 2004 Posts: 130
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 5:03 am
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
The AT is far from underpowered. The 2.5 has a good amount of torque
and the AT is pretty good. To each his own but the stock stereo and
speakers just plain suck when compared to a mid level aftermarket
system. >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 17, 2004 Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:07 am
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
>>Personally I think the Baja
>>is doomed as it doesnt offer any advantages >>over other vehicles in
the
>>line .
I have to disagree here. The back of my Baja is perfect for hauling
stuff to the local landfill and bringing back a load of free mulch.
Plus, I can fit two bikes in the back securely and quickly.
I do agree it'd be nice to have room for 3 in the back but aside from
that I'm happy with mine.
Jay M
'03 Subaru Baja (nonTurbo, 5sp)
Hillsboro, VA<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 30, 2004 Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 1:30 pm
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
get the turbo Baja......I love mine, for me more useful than my previous
Outback
"Shwackman" <shwackman RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041216183152.08318.00002371@mb-m04.aol.com...
> HI All, I've got a case of car fever for a Baja, are there any reasons to
> avoid
> one, or any quirks, (other than looks) that I should know about?
> I'm looking at the base line model, no-turbo w/automatic, for highway use,
> TIA, Mark C.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 13, 2004 Posts: 174
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 2:40 pm
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"David Ryeburn" <ryeburn RemoveThis @sfu.caz> wrote in message
news:ryeburn-38E194.01112417122004@news.telus.net...
> I can think of another possible explanation. Perhaps Baja buyers are
> very different from Outback buyers, and either expect more of their
> vehicles or treat them more harshly.
>
> David, quite happy with his nearly 8 year old 1997 Legacy Outback with
> almost 269,000 km on it
>
> --
That's entirely possible as well. I remember reading about some event
Subaru had back in the 1970s for the BRAT. They had some sort of off-road
unveiling where they foolishly allowed some automotive journalists to test
out the BRAT off-pavement. Apparently a lot of BRATs ended up stuck or
destroyed. The source I read this from intended to convey some sort of
inherent weakness in the BRAT's design, but I read between the lines and saw
a bunch of ham-fisted journalists trying to climb rocks with the stock
tires. I don't think these were the guys from Car and Driver either,
probably the doofus from the local paper.
Simply put, any time you push a vehicle beyond its intended limits, you're
going to have problems. An amusing story I heard once my first semester of
college: My lab partner was talking to a friend of his, and they were
gossiping about a mutual friend who had apparently done something very, very
dumb. There's a short off-road course somewhere around here, owned by the
local Hummer dealer designed to showcase new and prospective owners the
capabilities of their vehicle. Apparently you can also get into this test
track somehow, and their friend did so - with a brand new, totally stock
Jeep Wrangler. It didn't end well, with the Jeep completely destroyed and
these two guys laughing at their friend's misfortune.
-Matt<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 13, 2004 Posts: 68
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 4:40 pm
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Tyler Harter" <tanman05851<nospam>@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Ayrwd.1187$s6.803@fe03.lga:
> BTW-anybody have have any luck finding a remote control
> starter
> for their MT Subaru?Don't want to void my warranty and I'm not going to
> install myself-just looking for success/horror stories.
I personally haven't done it. I do have a story though. I was filling up at
a local gas station and noticed a nice new Impreza wagon and I talked to the
owner at the cash register about how she was liking her car. She says she
loves it BUT since she got her remote starter installed shes had nothing but
problems. She was waiting for her husband becuase it wouldn't start again.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 05, 2004 Posts: 144
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:40 pm
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 17 Dec 2004 07:07:39 -0800, Googler.RemoveThis@JayMontero.com wrote:
>Plus, I can fit two bikes in the back securely and quickly.
>
>I do agree it'd be nice to have room for 3 in the back but aside from
>that I'm happy with mine.
I can easily and quickly fit (4) bikes on the roof of my '01 OBW with
58" Yakima pipes. <G>
This happens to be the same number of riders I can comfortably fit
inside. Plus, the gear bags are stored out of the weather, in the
rear cargo compartment.
Of course, you can drive right into the garage! I can clear ATMs and
drive-thrus, but not a typical garage.
Barry<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 11, 2004 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:40 pm
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
THANKS for all the feedback! I'm really leaning toward the automatic/ NON-
turbo. I'm sure the turbo's more fun to drive, but by my calculations, it would
cost $3 more to fill per tankful, and have 35 miles less range.
I've got a tandem length bicycle I will haul a lot, the rear tire against
the bed extender, and the fork attached to the roof rack...looks like a perfect
fit with my measuring tape, and twice the mileage of my Dakota! >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 22, 2004 Posts: 48
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:24 pm
Post subject: Re: hot for a Baja.... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
When I bought my '04 Forester in August '04 there was a brand-new
stickered Baja next to it. It was at least an '03 model, and it might
have even been an '02.
I thought that was weird, but maybe a deal for the right person. >> Stay informed about: hot for a Baja.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Baja in Oz - Any word?
Baja Opinions - G'day, I have been looking at at the Baja as something that has pick-up versatility but is more car like both on the highway and in gas mileage. I know you don't get a pick-up but I don't think I will be carrying that type of load. My biggest concer...
BAJA issues???? - Thinking of picking up a used '05 Baja, 5 speed turbo, 21K miles. Anything in particular I should be looking out for?
Need light socket pigtail for 2003 Baja? - My girlfriend has a 2003 Baja. The socket or pigtail or whatever its called that plugs into the headlamp is needing replaced as its corroded and appears to be somewhat melted.... causing her headlight to go out due to poor contact and electrical flow. ...
FS: 16" WRX Alloy wheels with snow tires - I have four 16" Subaru WRX alloy wheels with Blizzak 205/55R16 WS-50 tires mounted. I purchased these last October and used them for one winter, about 4-5k miles. I paid $791 for the wheels and tires from Tirerack and would like to get $500 for th... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|