On 18 Jun 2005 02:50:46 -0500, Dave R <FunkingDave.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>"Adam Frazier" <abomb6900.RemoveThis@copper.net> wrote in
>news:42b36ae7_5@newsfeed.slurp.net:
>
>I dont think that 1 tons are really worth all that much anyways. I
> would give 500 bucks for it.
>
>
>Ty for offer, but I paid much-much more than that
>
Then you paid much-much too much.
>
>and with the fact that
>because of its size it is exempt from emissions in most localities
>
Because of its size it is also subject to commercial licensing and
insurance in many jurisdictions. This can be more expensive than
emissions maintenance and inspection. It certainly is where I live.
>
> and
>with its age it is also exempt from other regulations "like seat belt
>laws along with other trendy regulations",
>
If you believe that seat belts are merely trendy, you're nuts.
>
> I think the size thing is a
>plus.
>
But it's not what you think that counts. It's what a willing buyer
thinks that counts.
>
>Besides that you can buy a 2001 GMC truck with equal capacity,more
>miles on it, more rot, higher maintenence regulations and more repair
>headaches than this one will offer.
>
Heh. Obviously you haven't yet started pricing parts for that brake
problem you mentioned earlier. While you "can" buy such a truck as you
describe, the 2001 will definitely have much greater capacity for the
same designation (i.e., I suspect a 2001 1-ton has a greater weight
rating than a 1950 2-ton.) It may well have more miles, but in these
days of fuel-injection and better lubricants that isn't an issue. Rot
is usually related to location. If the '51 didn't rust where it was
for all those years, an -01 won't either.
I don't know that there are specific "maintenence regulations" for
medium-duty trucks in private ownership in most jurisdictions. There
aren't in California, which is usually the leader in such nonsense.
Assuming the repairs are done properly with new or excellent used
parts, almost any repair on the older truck will cost as much as the
same repair on the newer one, except for those done under the hood.
>
>Like I said "thanks for the offer", but if I EVER did part with this
>beauty I would need to see enough from it to compensate for me missing
>it for the rest of my life because between me and you I think it looks
>better than my woman, she aint getting better day by day and this thing
>might with a little work.
>
>I got a 1969 1/2 Polish model house-wife/cook/referee you can make an
>offer on 'cause then I don't have to build the addition and then I get
>to keep the truck.
>
>TY
>Dave
>
>
>PS: Kids go with woman, son can't mow lawn but I will include for free a
>new rideing mower and instruction manual so that you can teach him how
>to
>
==============================
You're hearing the same advice from people who know old trucks well,
some like Woogeroo who have invested major bucks and time in them over
a period of many years and know beyond question what they are worth.
The truck you have described is sitting behind farmers' barns and in
the back of corporation yards all over the country, and many of them
are given to anyone who will haul them off by people who are grateful
to be rid of them. Some of them show up repeatedly on eBay, with
reserve prices that get lower each time around. Many never sell. There
are usually a couple of them in the wrecking yard in my small town.
Joe
--
Heather & Joe Way
Sierra Specialty Automotive
Brake cylinders sleeved with brass
Gus Wilson Stories
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.brakecylinder.com" target="_blank">http://www.brakecylinder.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: ><A 1950 Chevy truck (51K on it and no rust)