 |
|
 |
|
Next: 206 CD Player noisey
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Sep 01, 2005 Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:55 pm
Post subject: fusion vs camry Archived from groups: alt>autos>ford (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 16, 2005 Posts: 1078
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:57 pm
Post subject: Re: fusion vs camry [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Drive both, then get a "total drive home price," then decide. Whichever one
you chose, I would suggest the V6 over the four in any event.
mike
"Gary" <klawreno RemoveThis @tds.net> wrote in message
news:tXePh.18538$G23.8975@newsreading01.news.tds.net...
>I am torn between the Toyota Camry auto 4 cyl and the fusion auto 4 cyl.
>Help
> >> Stay informed about: fusion vs camry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 08, 2006 Posts: 202
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:57 pm
Post subject: Re: fusion vs camry [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 31, 2007 Posts: 9
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:46 pm
Post subject: Re: fusion vs camry [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Picasso" <Picasso DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
news:BmiPh.17548$PV3.181564@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> Gary wrote:
>> I am torn between the Toyota Camry auto 4 cyl and the fusion auto 4 cyl.
>> Help
>
> dont be... buy the toyota.
Test drive them all, 4cyl and 6cyl alike and dont forget the Honda Accord. >> Stay informed about: fusion vs camry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 13, 2004 Posts: 716
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: fusion vs camry [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Picasso" <Picasso RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
news:yfsPh.17645$PV3.182624@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> If that camry comes in a 5spd model, i would go for that too. my work
> truck is a POS (BTW) 3.0L Ranger 5spd, i switched to a brand new 3.0L
> Auto, what a gutless hog that is... the 5speed transmission "Feels" very
> strange... and has no power.
So if power was so important, why didn't you get the 4.0L Ranger? Over the
years we have owned a number of Rangers. At the moment I own a Frontier V6
and my Mother still has my Father's old 4.0L V-6 Ranger. In a drag race, the
Frontier wins easily. But the Ranger gets much better gas mileage and the
engine works much better when I am actually using the vehicles as a "truck."
Prior to the 4.0L Ranger, my Father had a 3.0L Ranger (automatic). It ws a
very good truck.
> A 5 spd 4banger isn't bad. Toyota is a much higher quality car than that
> focus ever was, and ever will be.
The OP was talking about a Fusion, not a Focus. CR rates the Fusion very
highly. They rate the Focus highly (same as they rate the Corolla) - from
CR:
"The Focus is agile and fun to drive, and it handles like a sports car. The
seating position is high and commanding, controls are clear and logically
placed, and cabin access is easy. The ride is firm, yet supple. "
Ed >> Stay informed about: fusion vs camry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 16, 2005 Posts: 1078
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:51 pm
Post subject: Re: fusion vs camry [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Forget about the list price, or even the selling price, what counts is the
TOTAL price that one must pay to drive it home. Many dealers will not even
give one a TOTAL price until after one signs on the bottom line. If that is
the case, take a walk and find a dealer that will.
mike
"Picasso" <Picasso DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
news:LfsPh.17647$PV3.182624@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> El Bandito wrote:
>> Mike Hunter wrote:
>>> Drive both, then get a "total drive home price," then decide. Whichever
>>> one you chose, I would suggest the V6 over the four in any event.
>>>
>>> mike
>>
>> I will agree...
>>
>>> "Gary" <klawreno DeleteThis @tds.net> wrote in message
>>> news:tXePh.18538$G23.8975@newsreading01.news.tds.net...
>>>> I am torn between the Toyota Camry auto 4 cyl and the fusion auto 4
>>>> cyl. Help
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> Whats the difference in list price on the two cars?
> >> Stay informed about: fusion vs camry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 33
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:51 pm
Post subject: Re: fusion vs camry [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2.DeleteThis@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:bu6dneaXcNjOkI3bnZ2dnUVZ_uGjnZ2d@ptd.net...
> Forget about the list price, or even the selling price, what counts is the
> TOTAL price that one must pay to drive it home. Many dealers will not
> even give one a TOTAL price until after one signs on the bottom line. If
> that is the case, take a walk and find a dealer that will.
>
> mike
That's the road to the poor house.
What matters is EXPENSE and cars that are good on gas, don't require a lot
of repairs and don't depreciate are less EXPENSIVE. These cars are called
"Hondas" and "Toyotas."
> "Picasso" <Picasso.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:LfsPh.17647$PV3.182624@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>> El Bandito wrote:
>>> Mike Hunter wrote:
>>>> Drive both, then get a "total drive home price," then decide.
>>>> Whichever one you chose, I would suggest the V6 over the four in any
>>>> event.
>>>>
>>>> mike
>>>
>>> I will agree...
>>>
>>>> "Gary" <klawreno.DeleteThis@tds.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:tXePh.18538$G23.8975@newsreading01.news.tds.net...
>>>>> I am torn between the Toyota Camry auto 4 cyl and the fusion auto 4
>>>>> cyl. Help
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Whats the difference in list price on the two cars?
>>
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >> Stay informed about: fusion vs camry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 16, 2005 Posts: 1078
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:16 pm
Post subject: Re: fusion vs camry [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Do you believe that the dealer of the brand offering $3,000 under wholesale
for a three year old Civic, is car that "don't depreciate" LOL
mike
"dh" <dh.RemoveThis@stargate.com> wrote in message
news:46100b55$0$16295$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
> Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2.RemoveThis@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:bu6dneaXcNjOkI3bnZ2dnUVZ_uGjnZ2d@ptd.net...
>> Forget about the list price, or even the selling price, what counts is
>> the TOTAL price that one must pay to drive it home. Many dealers will
>> not even give one a TOTAL price until after one signs on the bottom line.
>> If that is the case, take a walk and find a dealer that will.
>>
>> mike
>
> That's the road to the poor house.
>
> What matters is EXPENSE and cars that are good on gas, don't require a lot
> of repairs and don't depreciate are less EXPENSIVE. These cars are called
> "Hondas" and "Toyotas."
>
>> "Picasso" <Picasso.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:LfsPh.17647$PV3.182624@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>>> El Bandito wrote:
>>>> Mike Hunter wrote:
>>>>> Drive both, then get a "total drive home price," then decide.
>>>>> Whichever one you chose, I would suggest the V6 over the four in any
>>>>> event.
>>>>>
>>>>> mike
>>>>
>>>> I will agree...
>>>>
>>>>> "Gary" <klawreno.RemoveThis@tds.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:tXePh.18538$G23.8975@newsreading01.news.tds.net...
>>>>>> I am torn between the Toyota Camry auto 4 cyl and the fusion auto 4
>>>>>> cyl. Help
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Whats the difference in list price on the two cars?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >> Stay informed about: fusion vs camry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 33
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:16 pm
Post subject: Re: fusion vs camry [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 RemoveThis @mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:DoednRPwNr7cvI3bnZ2dnUVZ_ompnZ2d@ptd.net...
> Do you believe that the dealer of the brand offering $3,000 under
> wholesale for a three year old Civic, is car that "don't depreciate" LOL
>
> mike
That's what dealers do when they don't need to bend over backwards to make a
sale on cars that don't depreciate.
Your imaginary friend should have offered the car for sale himself and been
prepared with his own financing.
> "dh" <dh RemoveThis @stargate.com> wrote in message
> news:46100b55$0$16295$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
>> Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2 RemoveThis @mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:bu6dneaXcNjOkI3bnZ2dnUVZ_uGjnZ2d@ptd.net...
>>> Forget about the list price, or even the selling price, what counts is
>>> the TOTAL price that one must pay to drive it home. Many dealers will
>>> not even give one a TOTAL price until after one signs on the bottom
>>> line. If that is the case, take a walk and find a dealer that will.
>>>
>>> mike
>>
>> That's the road to the poor house.
>>
>> What matters is EXPENSE and cars that are good on gas, don't require a
>> lot of repairs and don't depreciate are less EXPENSIVE. These cars are
>> called "Hondas" and "Toyotas."
>>
>>> "Picasso" <Picasso RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:LfsPh.17647$PV3.182624@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>>>> El Bandito wrote:
>>>>> Mike Hunter wrote:
>>>>>> Drive both, then get a "total drive home price," then decide.
>>>>>> Whichever one you chose, I would suggest the V6 over the four in any
>>>>>> event.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mike
>>>>>
>>>>> I will agree...
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Gary" <klawreno RemoveThis @tds.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:tXePh.18538$G23.8975@newsreading01.news.tds.net...
>>>>>>> I am torn between the Toyota Camry auto 4 cyl and the fusion auto 4
>>>>>>> cyl. Help
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Whats the difference in list price on the two cars?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >> Stay informed about: fusion vs camry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 16, 2005 Posts: 1078
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:55 pm
Post subject: Re: fusion vs camry [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Are you kidding? Perhaps you can sell your ten year old $1,000 cars but
have you ever tried to sell a three year old car? Nine out of ten that show
up at your door have a car they need to sell before they can buy yours and
they rest can't get a loan
You actually think his three year old Civic, that a Honda dealer, ($10,000
for a car that cost $21,000 new,) who would not even trade at the $13,000
wholesale price, is a car that had good resale value? I guess we can assume
you missed your economic 101 class LOL
mike
"dh" <dh.RemoveThis@stargate.com> wrote in message
news:4610251a$1$12467$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2.RemoveThis@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:DoednRPwNr7cvI3bnZ2dnUVZ_ompnZ2d@ptd.net...
>> Do you believe that the dealer of the brand offering $3,000 under
>> wholesale for a three year old Civic, is car that "don't depreciate" LOL
>>
>> mike
>
> That's what dealers do when they don't need to bend over backwards to make
> a sale on cars that don't depreciate. >> Stay informed about: fusion vs camry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 30, 2007 Posts: 19
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:55 pm
Post subject: Re: fusion vs camry [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:57:54 -0400, "Mike Hunter"
<mikehunt2.RemoveThis@mailcity.com> wrote:
>Are you kidding? Perhaps you can sell your ten year old $1,000 cars but
>have you ever tried to sell a three year old car? Nine out of ten that show
>up at your door have a car they need to sell before they can buy yours and
>they rest can't get a loan
>
>You actually think his three year old Civic, that a Honda dealer, ($10,000
>for a car that cost $21,000 new,) who would not even trade at the $13,000
>wholesale price, is a car that had good resale value? I guess we can assume
>you missed your economic 101 class LOL
>
>mike
Try buying a 3 yo Civic at a dealer and you'll pay close to the new
price. Dealers rape you coming and going.
The old motto about buying new, buy Japanese; buying used, buy North
American. >> Stay informed about: fusion vs camry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|