 |
|
 |
|
Next: hot for a Baja....
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Nov 16, 2004 Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:27 pm
Post subject: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 Archived from groups: alt>autos>dodge (more info?)
|
|
|
|
| Anyone having problems with the dodge intrepid 2.7 L engine, I have a
cheaper and better solution for you. I own an automotive shop and we have
been installing the optional 3.2l engine with very successful results,
cheaper than a replacement 2.7l. If you have any questions or interest in
the 3.2 conversion, feel free to contact me via email.
|
>> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 03, 2004 Posts: 1706
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Im just wondering what happens down the road when the vehicle fails a State
emissions program, If the labels/vin/engine and all that dont match, it wont
fly thru, not to say thats considered tampering (federal offence) And what
about the engine controller??? 2.7-3.2??? i belive there is a difference
Glenn Beasley
Chrysler Tech
"toyota1" <comptonauto.RemoveThis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:345e7508830efa906fbee78be6ff1eaa@localhost.talkaboutautos.com...
> Anyone having problems with the dodge intrepid 2.7 L engine, I have a
> cheaper and better solution for you. I own an automotive shop and we have
> been installing the optional 3.2l engine with very successful results,
> cheaper than a replacement 2.7l. If you have any questions or interest in
> the 3.2 conversion, feel free to contact me via email.
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 14, 2004 Posts: 17
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 11:41 am
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
With a name of "toyota1", I wouldn't trust this person's work on my Mopar.
My 2.7 has just under 96,000 miles on it. Still has a lot of power, and no
smoking, whatsoever. What's the problem?
Larry
Unlock the Universe
"toyota1" <comptonauto DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:345e7508830efa906fbee78be6ff1eaa@localhost.talkaboutautos.com...
| Anyone having problems with the dodge intrepid 2.7 L engine, I have a
| cheaper and better solution for you. I own an automotive shop and we have
| been installing the optional 3.2l engine with very successful results,
| cheaper than a replacement 2.7l. If you have any questions or interest in
| the 3.2 conversion, feel free to contact me via email.
| >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 16, 2004 Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 3:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
The emissions have not been a problem. Vehicles that have been tested have
passed. Also the 2.7l ecu will run the 3.2 engines without any problems.
State laws vary depending on the state, and there are certain processes in
some states that require you to register a vehicle as "rebuilt" in this
situation. >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 16, 2004 Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 3:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
larry, the problem with the 2.7 is that the oil pickup and passages in the
cylinder heads are too small and it causes a large amount of sludge to
form, thus reducing the oil flow to the top end, and damaging timing chain
and valve train. as these are an interference engine, if the timing chain
breaks, pistons hit valves, and so on.. ive seen 2.7s with 40k miles on up
to 120k miles fail. it all depends on the maintenance of the vehicle. sorry
you feel that way about toyotas, but my truck with 200k miles and original
engine, etc, is much more impressive than my dodge intrepid 2.7 that
failed with 45k miles on it, and my dodge truck (used to have) that the
transmission failed at 70k, and both had had oil changes done every 4k
miles since new, trans fluid flush every 25k. it now has a 3.2 with almost
20k miles and is running perfectly. >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 03, 2004 Posts: 1706
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 4:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Alot of that is due to using the wrong viscostiy oil, and not changing it
at the proper time, i havent seen alot of problems here at the shop except
for a few....and they were destroyed because the owners neglected them.
Glenn Beasley
Chrysler Tech
"toyota1" <comptonauto.DeleteThis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4c5b02433453bc607bf46f91fa2dcde4@localhost.talkaboutautos.com...
> larry, the problem with the 2.7 is that the oil pickup and passages in the
> cylinder heads are too small and it causes a large amount of sludge to
> form, thus reducing the oil flow to the top end, and damaging timing chain
> and valve train. as these are an interference engine, if the timing chain
> breaks, pistons hit valves, and so on.. ive seen 2.7s with 40k miles on up
> to 120k miles fail. it all depends on the maintenance of the vehicle.
sorry
> you feel that way about toyotas, but my truck with 200k miles and original
> engine, etc, is much more impressive than my dodge intrepid 2.7 that
> failed with 45k miles on it, and my dodge truck (used to have) that the
> transmission failed at 70k, and both had had oil changes done every 4k
> miles since new, trans fluid flush every 25k. it now has a 3.2 with almost
> 20k miles and is running perfectly.
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 03, 2004 Posts: 1706
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 4:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
O...im not refering to now, im talking about a few yrs down the road when
they fail, when the numbers dont match and the veci sticker doesnt jive and
maybe time for a waiver, or the inspector catches it, like i said, that is
considered Tampering. I bouhgt my wife a 2003 sebring with the
2.7............. 5w30 oil every 3k. i wont have a problem
Glenn Beasley
Chrysler Tech
"toyota1" <comptonauto.DeleteThis@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4601dcc67e9dd75a3fdebe3963d20580@localhost.talkaboutautos.com...
> The emissions have not been a problem. Vehicles that have been tested have
> passed. Also the 2.7l ecu will run the 3.2 engines without any problems.
> State laws vary depending on the state, and there are certain processes in
> some states that require you to register a vehicle as "rebuilt" in this
> situation.
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 03, 2004 Posts: 1706
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 4:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Before the law was revised in 1990, it was only illegal for professional
mechanics to remove or disconnect emission control devices. There was
nothing to prevent a motorist from tampering with their own vehicles. That
loophole has since been plugged.
THINGS NOT TO DO
Any of the following may be considered emissions tampering and get you into
trouble:
a.. Removing the EGR valve or plugging its vacuum lines
b.. Removing or disconnecting the PCV valve
c.. Removing the stock air cleaner and heat riser duct plumbing
d.. Removing the catalytic converter
e.. Removing or disconnecting the air pump
f.. Removing or modifying the stock distributor vacuum advance/retard
g.. Altering the stock ignition advance mechanism or timing curve
h.. Replacing the stock distributor with an aftermarket unit that is not
emissions certified
i.. Modifying, removing or replacing the stock computer or PROM chip with
a non-certified component
j.. Blocking the heat riser duct under the intake manifold
k.. Knocking out the filler restrictor on the fuel tank inlet pipe
l.. Replacing the stock non-vented gas cap with a vented cap
m.. Removing or disconnecting the fuel vapor recovery canister
n.. Changing the idle mixture or stock carburetor jetting
o.. Removing or modifying the carburetor choke
p.. Modifying or replacing the carburetor accelerator pump with
non-certified components
q.. Installing an intake manifold or racing manifold that lacks provisions
for the stock EGR valve and/or a heat riser duct
r.. Installing a carburetor that lacks the stock emission hookups
s.. Installing non-certified fuel injectors
t.. Installing a long duration "racing" cam that is not
emissions-certified
u.. Installing exhaust headers that lack provisions for a heat riser
valve, an air cleaner preheat stove or fittings for an oxygen sensor (if
required)
v.. Installing valve covers with open breathers or no fittings for a PCV
valve
w.. Installing any induction, fuel or ignition system component that is
NOT emissions legal
"toyota1" <comptonauto DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4601dcc67e9dd75a3fdebe3963d20580@localhost.talkaboutautos.com...
> The emissions have not been a problem. Vehicles that have been tested have
> passed. Also the 2.7l ecu will run the 3.2 engines without any problems.
> State laws vary depending on the state, and there are certain processes in
> some states that require you to register a vehicle as "rebuilt" in this
> situation.
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 04, 2004 Posts: 842
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:12 pm
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
5w30 Synthetic? Or, dino?
"maxpower" <damnnickname DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:y7CdnUDY9ph62V7cRVn-gA@comcast.com...
> O...im not refering to now, im talking about a few yrs down the road when
> they fail, when the numbers dont match and the veci sticker doesnt jive
> and
> maybe time for a waiver, or the inspector catches it, like i said, that is
> considered Tampering. I bouhgt my wife a 2003 sebring with the
> 2.7............. 5w30 oil every 3k. i wont have a problem
> Glenn Beasley
> Chrysler Tech
> "toyota1" <comptonauto DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:4601dcc67e9dd75a3fdebe3963d20580@localhost.talkaboutautos.com...
>> The emissions have not been a problem. Vehicles that have been tested
>> have
>> passed. Also the 2.7l ecu will run the 3.2 engines without any problems.
>> State laws vary depending on the state, and there are certain processes
>> in
>> some states that require you to register a vehicle as "rebuilt" in this
>> situation.
>>
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 16, 2004 Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 9:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 16, 2004 Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 9:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 16, 2004 Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 9:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
also, how is it considered tampering when none of the emissions components
are removed or compromised? would it not be the same "tampering" if you
were to remove a v6 from a 1981 monte carlo and replace with a 5.7l???
all you are doing is replacing the standard 2.7 with the optional
3.2l---90% of the parts except hoses, intake and radiator are
different...... >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 14, 2004 Posts: 17
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2004 11:52 am
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I don't have sludging problems. Maybe my oil, filter and maintenance
combinations work. I don't use Pennzoil. Here's one oil that creates sludge.
I've seen it sludge up rebuilt engines in no time. I just can't bring myself
to buy a foreign manufacturer's vehicle.
Larry
Unlock the Universe
"toyota1" <comptonauto DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:4c5b02433453bc607bf46f91fa2dcde4@localhost.talkaboutautos.com...
| larry, the problem with the 2.7 is that the oil pickup and passages in the
| cylinder heads are too small and it causes a large amount of sludge to
| form, thus reducing the oil flow to the top end, and damaging timing chain
| and valve train. as these are an interference engine, if the timing chain
| breaks, pistons hit valves, and so on.. ive seen 2.7s with 40k miles on up
| to 120k miles fail. it all depends on the maintenance of the vehicle.
sorry
| you feel that way about toyotas, but my truck with 200k miles and original
| engine, etc, is much more impressive than my dodge intrepid 2.7 that
| failed with 45k miles on it, and my dodge truck (used to have) that the
| transmission failed at 70k, and both had had oil changes done every 4k
| miles since new, trans fluid flush every 25k. it now has a 3.2 with almost
| 20k miles and is running perfectly.
| >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 24, 2004 Posts: 413
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:17 am
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:52:15 -0700, "Larry Crites"
<larrycrites DeleteThis @bresnan.net> wrote:
>I don't have sludging problems. Maybe my oil, filter and maintenance
>combinations work. I don't use Pennzoil. Here's one oil that creates sludge.
>I've seen it sludge up rebuilt engines in no time. I just can't bring myself
>to buy a foreign manufacturer's vehicle.
>
>Larry
>Unlock the Universe
For me, that "foreign manufacturer" builts Corollas only a few miles
from my home, and many people in my town make their living there.
Another major "foreign manufacturer" (Honda) builds vehicles just over
100km away in Aliston Ont - and there are a significant number of jobs
in our area supplying parts etc for that plant as well.
Then there is tha "German" company, that builds cars in Bramalea, also
within 100km of here, as well as in Windor, Belvedere Ind., Mexico,
and at least a dozen other places - the company formerly known as
Chrysler.
>
>"toyota1" <comptonauto DeleteThis @earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:4c5b02433453bc607bf46f91fa2dcde4@localhost.talkaboutautos.com...
>| larry, the problem with the 2.7 is that the oil pickup and passages in the
>| cylinder heads are too small and it causes a large amount of sludge to
>| form, thus reducing the oil flow to the top end, and damaging timing chain
>| and valve train. as these are an interference engine, if the timing chain
>| breaks, pistons hit valves, and so on.. ive seen 2.7s with 40k miles on up
>| to 120k miles fail. it all depends on the maintenance of the vehicle.
>sorry
>| you feel that way about toyotas, but my truck with 200k miles and original
>| engine, etc, is much more impressive than my dodge intrepid 2.7 that
>| failed with 45k miles on it, and my dodge truck (used to have) that the
>| transmission failed at 70k, and both had had oil changes done every 4k
>| miles since new, trans fluid flush every 25k. it now has a 3.2 with almost
>| 20k miles and is running perfectly.
>|
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 14, 2004 Posts: 17
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Yes, there are jobs here for "our" people, and their money comes back into
their community. But where do the corporate profits go that pays the big
officer's salaries? There's still a Pentastar in Highland Park. I know,
there is no "American" auto manufacturer anymore, with all the imported
parts, assembly across our border, etc. But, at least the assembly portion
is North American. Besides, I like Canada. Has lots of pretty areas. A lot
of the people are nice, too.
Larry
Unlock the Universe
<nospam.clare.nce.RemoveThis@sny.der.on.ca> wrote in message
news:avv9s0l0uk7h7k13ruu00d0d2vgcc87jqt@4ax.com...
|
| For me, that "foreign manufacturer" builts Corollas only a few miles
| from my home, and many people in my town make their living there.
| Another major "foreign manufacturer" (Honda) builds vehicles just over
| 100km away in Aliston Ont - and there are a significant number of jobs
| in our area supplying parts etc for that plant as well.
|
| Then there is tha "German" company, that builds cars in Bramalea, also
| within 100km of here, as well as in Windor, Belvedere Ind., Mexico,
| and at least a dozen other places - the company formerly known as
| Chrysler. >> Stay informed about: Dodge Intrepid 2.7L engine problems Replace with 3.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Please Help 2000 Dodge Intrepid - My primary timing chain tensioner went out and caused my chain to break through valve cover. All the timing was replaced and we also had to rework the heads. The car ran fine the evening later that night it just went dead going down the road. When we..
2000 Dodge Intrepid - I have a 2000 Dodge Intrepid for sale! Replaced timing chain, tensioner & water pump. WILL NOT CRANK!!!!! Has 2.7 engine, 24 valve. 6cyl. $1500 email at modom5@comcast.net
95 dodge intrepid - I have been having problems when I start the car my gauges don't work or sometimes after about 30 seconds then they will come on. Also one time I was driving and turned on the cruise and the car went into low gear by itself at 55mph and then my gear..
Dodge Intrepid door - My 2002 Dodge Intrepid's driver door will only unlock by winding the window down and using the exterior latch to open the door. What will it take to fix this problem. It's annoying and frustrating to have to do this. I would like to know if anyone else..
96 Dodge Intrepid problem - Hi. My 96 Dodge Intrepid has an interesting problem. The check engine light is on and it is running a little rough, but other than that it is normally ok. The problem is when it has been driven for a half hour or so and has gotten warmed up it will di... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|