Welcome to AutoForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Hyundai preformance on icy raods

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
   car problems (Home) -> Hyundai RSS
Next:  Fuel Door Release in 2004 Sonota  
Author Message
jp103

External


Since: Mar 01, 2007
Posts: 40



(Msg. 61) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>autos>hyundai (more info?)

Matt Whiting wrote:
> jp103 wrote:
>
> Is this Brian under an assumed name?

No it's just that AWD is NOT the solution to better winter driving.

If you read the OP he says a couple of things that should have been the
logical extension of this thread.

1)"The vehicle has never behaved badly on snowy roads, or slushy roads,
just ice." And then goes on about how the front end is heavy so in his
estimation the car should be better on ice. This is one point of
discussion - should a car that is front-end heavy be better on ice (my
response is no why would you expect more mass to be better than less
when the coefficient of friction is less?)
2)"Anybody out there have similar experience with Hyundai and ice?"
I don't think there were many answers to this
3)"I run my tires high (35-40 psi), would lowering that help?" Was there
any response to this?

I'm not going to get into your and Brian agreement to disagree. All I
am saying is that for all-around winter driving where snow and ice are
more than an occasional occurrence winter tires make a difference. Your
post that I responded to even said the same "For maximum traction, equip
it with winter tires. In less-snowy areas, front-wheel drive and a set
of winter tires should suffice. Mount winter tires on all four wheels
for balanced handling." Of course this didn't seem to make an
impression on you so you needed to add "The only thing they left out is
that all-season tires also suffice in most areas of the country." Well
excuse me but we really aren't talking about most areas of the country.
I thought that the discussion was about areas of the country with snow
and ice conditions where WINTER (my emphasis) tires do make a difference
that even your supporting quotes seem to say. Just because you perceive
that someone is siding with Brian does not mean that it is Brian under
an assumed name.

 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Brian Nystrom

External


Since: May 17, 2005
Posts: 436



(Msg. 62) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Matt Whiting wrote:
> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>>>> Darby OGill wrote:
>>>>>> "> Depends where you live. In mid-Michigan (Lansing area), keeping
>>>>>> an extra set
>>>>>>> of tires just for snow couldn't be justified by most drivers. And
>>>>>>> accordingly, it's not a very common practice. Maybe in upper
>>>>>>> Michigan where they get clobbered by lake-effect snow but not the
>>>>>>> rest of the state.
>>>>>> I know what your saying, but it brings to mind something my mother
>>>>>> used to say about cars..."It doesn't cost anymore to keep the tank
>>>>>> full as it does empty" Once you've bought the snows and cheap
>>>>>> steel wheels, it doesn't cost any more to employ them. Miles put
>>>>>> on snows are miles not put on regular tires....BTW how many of us
>>>>>> use summer tires as opposed to all season radials, and is anyone
>>>>>> troiubled by that performance compromise (wet weather, braking and
>>>>>> handling). There, I'm done beating the dead horse<grin>.....I
>>>>>> guess the group does largely agree on one thing- The OP faulting
>>>>>> Hyundai is mostly without merit.(I think the touchy throttle
>>>>>> observation was a good one though)
>>>>>
>>>>> And it does cost more to use snow tires. They wear much faster
>>>>> than an all-season or summer tire so every mile put on a snow tire
>>>>> is more costly than a mile put on an all-season or summer tire.
>>>>
>>>> That's simply not true and since you haven't used any in over 30
>>>> years, you have nothing to base that conclusion on.
>>>
>>> It simply is true:
>>>
>>> http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/tires-auto-parts/tires/tire-so...r-winte
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.consumersearch.com/www/automotive/snow-tires/review.html
>>
>> Did you even read either of these articles??? Here's the first
>> paragraph from the second one:
>
> Yes, I read them both.
>
>
>> "Even if your car has traction control or an ABS braking system, those
>> features won't improve traction on snow and ice. Experts at The Tire
>> Rack say only snow tires will actually improve grip on snow and ice.
>> Although all-wheel-drive or front-wheel-drive is an advantage, you'll
>> still improve safety by swapping your summer or all-season tires for
>> winter ones. This is because snow tires have special tread designs
>> that help them bite into the snow. Snow tires also use a softer rubber
>> compound, so they stay flexible at lower temperatures."
>>
>> That certainly doesn't support your anti-winter tire assertions.
>
> I've never made an anti-winter tire assertion. I'm not against them,
> I've said they are better than all-season tires in snow and ice, but
> I've also said that all-seasons are more than adequate for my needs and
> thus I don't need winter tires.

Fair enough, but you certainly are going out of your way to rationalize
that decision and discourage others from trying winter tires.

>>> Winter tires lack the tread wear rating for a reason.
>>
>> They lack a tread wear rating because they're not designed for
>> year-round use.
>
> And because they wear so quickly consumers would be shocked at the numbers.

More BS from you, Matt? My tires are wearing quite slowly. Please do
explain why so we can all be enlightened.

>>> I also said I haven't used snow tires on my CARS in over 30 years,
>>> but I do use them on my snow plow truck and they wear MUCH faster
>>> than all-season tires.
>>
>> On your truck I can believe it, but on cars it's not true, at least
>> not in the absolute terms you proclaim. I can give you a perfect
>> example, the tires on my Elantra. The car is an '04 and I've driven
>> both sets of tires for four seasons (the winter season isn't over yet,
>> but it's close enough). My summer tires - the stock Michelins that
>> came on the car - are completely worn out and must be replaced.
>> Actually, they really should have been replaced before last season,
>> but they just passed inspection. In contrast, my winter tires still
>> have 2/3 of their original depth. They will last at least another
>> season and perhaps two.
>
> Tires wear by the mile not by the season.

Gee, no kidding? If it makes you feel any better, I drive the same
distances year round, in the same manner and mostly highway miles. I
typically use my summer tires ~20% more than my winter tires, which is
nowhere near enough to explain the increased wear. Your blanket
statement about tire wear is obviously, blatantly false, but you
apparently can't deal with being wrong.

>>> Winter tire design and
>>>> rubber formulations have changed considerably. While it's true that
>>>> they use softer tread compounds than some "all season tires",
>>>> they're quite durable in the colder winter temperatures they're
>>>> designed for. They're often MORE durable that typical soft summer
>>>> "performance" compounds. My winter tires last at least as many
>>>> seasons as my summer tires and they typically cost less. Once you
>>>> amortize the cost of the extra set of wheels, it's all gravy (I had
>>>> one set of wheels that I used on four cars between '84 and '04).
>>>> Unless one drives aggressively year-round when on dry pavement,
>>>> there is no significant downside to winter tires. There ARE
>>>> significant safety and performance advantages to them in nasty
>>>> winter conditions. There isn't any inconvenience, either. As Darby
>>>> pointed out, instead of rotating your tires twice per year (which we
>>>> should be doing anyway), you just swap from summers to winters and
>>>> vice versa - rotating them whenever they're reinstalled, of course.
>>>> If making the switch forces people to rotate their tires when they
>>>> might not do it otherwise, their summer tires will last longer and
>>>> they'll actually see some cost saving from it.
>>>
>>> I have no doubt that snow tires will outlast performance summer tires
>>> as they have VERY soft compounds and absolutely lousy tread life.
>>> However, they will not outwear a good all-season tire, not even
>>> close. Post even one credible reference that suggests otherwise.
>>
>> Obviously, you're wrong, as the results on my car prove. I don't need
>> a reference, I have the tires to prove it. If it makes you happy, I'll
>> send you pictures of both. Your argument is simply a fabrication to
>> support your bias against winter tires.
>
> You haven't provided any data to prove anything. You have provided no
> mileages for the life of any tires, just "seasons" which is irrelevant.

See the details above. You're wrong, get over it.

>>>> Frankly, most of the arguments against winter tires - for people who
>>>> live in climates where they're justified - really boil down to one
>>>> of three things:
>>>>
>>>> - I don't want to
>>>>
>>>> - I don't care
>>>>
>>>> - I'm too cheap
>>>
>>> No, they boil down to "I don't need them." It is as simple as that.
>>>
>>> A question for you, do you drive only all-wheel drive vehicles?
>>
>> Don't change the subject. I've already covered that ground in another
>> post.
>
> You aren't consistent. If you want the best possible performance, then
> you must drive AWD along with your snow tires. If you aren't driving
> AWD vehicles, then you are settling for less than the best.

Please show me where I ever said that I wanted the "best possible
performance". You made that up, which is pretty lame, Matt.

Everything to do with automotive performance is a compromise. When it
comes to dealing with winter conditions, I draw the line at spending
thousands of extra dollars for AWD or 4WD vehicles and thousands more in
increased fuel, insurance and maintenance costs to gain a marginal
improvement in acceleration traction in winter conditions (AWD/4WD does
nothing to improve braking or cornering in slippery conditions). I'm far
more concerned with being able to turn and stop than I am with
accelerating or getting stuck (I've only gotten stuck - briefly - in
snow once in the past 30 years, and that was because I tried to drive
though 18" of it in an un-plowed parking lot). The poor handling and
high center of gravity of many SUVs - particularly those that are truck
based - is arguably more likely to cause an accident than their AWD/4WD
systems are to prevent one. IMO, most SUV drivers would be better off
with a car that inherently handles better, equipped with four winter
tires. The environment would be better off too, but that's another
discussion entirely.

You and I apparently draw the line at different point and that's fine.
However, your fabrication of bogus disadvantages to winter tires in an
effort to justify your position is just plain pathetic.

 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Brian Nystrom

External


Since: May 17, 2005
Posts: 436



(Msg. 63) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Matt Whiting wrote:
> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>>> Mike Marlow wrote:
>>>>> It's not all about being able to take off. It's also about being
>>>>> able to stop, avoid, etc.
>>>>
>>>> That's exactly my point. Snow tires improve performance in ALL of
>>>> those categories in bad conditions.
>>>>
>>>>>> Saying you need snow tires is like saying you need all-wheel
>>>>>> drive. All-wheel drive is better than FWD, but that doesn't mean
>>>>>> that every NEEDS it. Same with snow tires.
>>>>
>>>> No, it's not like that at all. The truth is that very few people
>>>> actually NEED 4WD or AWD, they just THINK they do. They perceive
>>>> benefits that simply aren't there and ignore the downsides.
>>>>
>>>> What people actually need is better traction in a vehicle that
>>>> handles well. FWD and AWD are not a guarantee of the former, since
>>>> the tires are at least as large of a factor as the drive system, and
>>>> they're a definite disadvantage when it come to handling, except in
>>>> the case of some higher-end AWD systems in cars.
>>>>
>>>>> Which leaves unturned, that huge stone that attempts to argue that
>>>>> since 4WD will take off better in snow, move through snow better
>>>>> with 7 1/2 feet of steel sticking off the nose, and in fact push
>>>>> the weight of that snow ahead of that 7 1/2 feet of steel, that 4WD
>>>>> must be better in snow. There are downsides to the confidence that
>>>>> falsely creeps into people's minds when there are niche benefits to
>>>>> things.
>>>>
>>>> Absolutely! It's what convinces people to spend thousands of extra
>>>> dollars on vehicles that are no better in the snow - and often worse
>>>> - than a FWD car with a few hundred dollars worth of snow tires on
>>>> it. It's also what makes them feel invincible enough to drive like
>>>> idiots in bad conditions and ultimately end up off the road on their
>>>> roofs.
>>>
>>> http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/new-cars/news/2005/winter-driv...-405-wi
>>
>>
>>
>> You didn't read this one either, did you? It supports my assertions
>> much more than yours.
>
> Yes, I read it and it supports my assertions just fine.
>
> What part of "The best were the all-wheel-drive cars, which reached
> almost 20 mph sooner, on average, than the front-drive cars equipped
> with winter tires." didn't you understand?

I understand that they accelerate faster, but what part of "Better
traction won't guarantee shorter stops. Braking distances on ice were
about the same for the all-wheel- and front-wheel-drive cars." didn't
you understand? As far as I'm concerned, acceleration is a minor
consideration and it's meaningless if you can't stop or turn. AWD/4WD
does nothing to help either and 4WD systems can actually increase
stopping distances and adversely affect cornering if the hubs are
locked. Look it up, Matt.

You also ignored this paragraph: "Winter tires yielded the biggest
snow-traction gain for the buck, however. Using them helped the
front-drive cars reach 20 mph nearly 28 feet sooner than they did with
all-season tires. Cost: about $400 for four winter tires plus another
$200 or so for an extra set of wheel rims to ease the switch to winter
tires."

Gee, I wonder who's been saying that all along?

> And what part of "Our advice. Consider an all-wheel-drive vehicle if you
> live in a snowy area or want added peace of mind. For maximum traction,
> equip it with winter tires. In less-snowy areas, front-wheel drive and a
> set of winter tires should suffice. Mount winter tires on all four
> wheels for balanced handling. Remove them after winter, since these
> tires wear quickly on dry roads (plan on about three winters of use).
> And be sure to opt for ABS on any vehicle." didn't you catch?
>
> AWD is best in snowy areas. Winter tires should SUFFICE (emphasis added
> so you can't miss it) in less-snow areas. "These tires (referring to
> winter tires) WEAR QUICKLY on dry roads. Again, emphasis added since
> you missed this the first time around.

Winter tires DO suffice and they perform better than ASRs, exactly as
the article states. If I lived in an area where deep snow was common and
AWD was truly needed (the risk of getting stuck was high), I'd own an
AWD vehicle and as the article recommends, I'd equip it with snow tires,
too. I don't seen any benefit to AWD with ASRs compared to front-drive
with snow tires for the type of conditions I typically face.
Acceleration is the least important factor in winter driving safety and
again, you don't gain anything in stopping or cornering with AWD. The
fact that it accelerates better creates a belief in drivers that
traction is better than it actually is and the result is many of them
get in trouble. OTOH, snow tires improve ALL aspects of performance in
slippery conditions. Shame on Consumer Reports for not testing cornering
and braking, as it would shed an entirely different light on the subject.
 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Brian Nystrom

External


Since: May 17, 2005
Posts: 436



(Msg. 64) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Matt Whiting wrote:
> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>> Mike Marlow wrote:
>>> "Brian Nystrom" <brian.nystrom DeleteThis @verizon.net> wrote in message
>>> news:I5Axj.4517$A93.4348@trndny08...
>>>
>>>> You can't simply make a blanket statement like that, as there are
>>>> dramatic differences in performance among the myriad tires labeled
>>>> as "all season". As I said before, I drive a lot of rental cars and
>>>> I've had to use many of them in snow and most of the performance of
>>>> the tires on them have range from "reasonably acceptible" to
>>>> "downright dangerous". NONE of them have been what I would call good
>>>> performers in snow, compared to my winter tires. Keep in mind that
>>>> all of these cars have had relatively low mileage on them, so the
>>>> tires with in good shape. Whether you believe it or not, the
>>>> difference IS quite substantial.
>>>
>>> I do agree that there are a ton of what I consider to be pure junk
>>> ASR's out there. Mainly in the touring tire category. It's not hard
>>> to find a nice soft, quiet tire that is junk in any condition other
>>> than cruising down dry interstates. They hydroplane badly, they
>>> corner badly, and they are as useless as slicks in the snow.
>>
>> That's exactly what my experience has been.
>>
>>> That said - I've had no trouble finding perfectly acceptable ASR's
>>> that serve me well year round.
>>
>> I certainly wish the cars I've been forced to drive had something like
>> that on them. I have yet to find ANY ASR that comes close to the
>> performance of winter tires in snow. I have to wonder if you might
>> think differently if you had the chance to do back-to-back comparisons
>> on the same car(s), as I have? That always seems to be the stumbling
>> block with most people. As I've said before, the people I've convinced
>> to try winter tires have ALL been stunned at the difference.
>> Essentially, they didn't realize what they were missing, which is
>> understandable. Tire companies have done a great job of selling the
>> "all season" myth.
>
> There is no myth so it must have been a REALLY hard sell!

Wow Matt, that's a really strong argument! You must have been the star
of your high school debate team.
 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Brian Nystrom

External


Since: May 17, 2005
Posts: 436



(Msg. 65) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Matt Whiting wrote:
> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, most of the people in the snow belt are like me and simply
>>>>> don't need snow tires. I did a quick search and was not able to
>>>>> find any detailed figures on USA tire sales by type, but I'll bet
>>>>> my 2% figure isn't far off as the fraction of total tire sales
>>>>> annually that are winter tires.
>>>>
>>>> Sales statistics are no indicator of need or efficacy, simply of
>>>> buying trends. A good example of that is the large percentage of
>>>> people that buy SUVs vs. how many actually have a real need for one.
>>>> I could easily argue that less than 2% of drivers have any real need
>>>> for an SUV. I could also reasonably argue that many - if not most -
>>>> SUV buyers would be better off in many ways if they bought a car and
>>>> a set of snow tires instead of an SUV.
>>>
>>> Neither is your opinion about snow tires any indicator of need or
>>> efficiency or tread life.
>>
>> If it were merely an opinion, that would be true. I have the
>> experiences to back it up.
>
> Your experiences are only the basis for your opinion. Many more of us
> have experiences exactly counter to yours. I assert that the odds are
> very high then that the majority of us are correct and you are not when
> you assert that everyone needs winter tires.

Please Matt, do tell us how many cars you've done back-to-back
comparisons of ASRs (or summer tires) with winter tires. I've done it on
6 vehicles with three brands of winter tires and at least 6 or 7 brands
of ASRs. While that's hardly the "test to end all tests", it's a lot
more credible than simply spewing "ASRs work well enough" over and over
again, and making up bogus disadvantages for winter tires, with no
comparative experience whatsoever.

I never once said that "everyone" needs winter tires. That's just
another of your pathetic attempts to discredit my position by making
things up.

As for being in the minority, I have no problem with that, as the
majority is not necessarily right, they just have other priorities, as I
alluded to earlier. Perhaps I should have added "I don't want to hear
it." and "I'm too stubborn to listen to reason." to my previous list. Wink

I have no problem with us disagreeing on the need for winter tires.
We're both big boys and we can make our own choices. However, if you're
going to try to justify your position by posting false or misleading
information and outright fabrications, I'm going to call you on it. This
could have been a useful debate that presented both sides and helped
others reading it make informed decisions, but sadly, it's become just
another internet pissing contest.
 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Brian Nystrom

External


Since: May 17, 2005
Posts: 436



(Msg. 66) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Matt Whiting wrote:
> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>>>> DonC wrote:
>>>>>> "Matt Whiting" <whiting DeleteThis @epix.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:06Kwj.88$555.1273@news1.epix.net...
>>>>>>> Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Brian Nystrom" <brian.nystrom DeleteThis @verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> I'm not against snow tires at all, I just don't need them ...
>>>>>>>>>> like 98% of the rest of the folks in the USA. There are 2%
>>>>>>>>>> who need them and they should buy and use them.
>>>>>>>>> Considering how much of the country lies in the "snow belt",
>>>>>>>>> that's a pretty ridiculous statement.
>>>>>>>> Maybe not. Back in the 50's, I remember putting full chains on
>>>>>>>> my father's car for the first couple of days after a snow. Main
>>>>>>>> roads were poorly plowed, side streets were not plowed at all.
>>>>>>>> We lived in Philadelphia and a 6" snow was a lot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've since moved to Connecticut and 10" to 12" is common. I've
>>>>>>>> never thought about snow tires. Why? They plow frequently,
>>>>>>>> they plow well, they treat the streets. In the worst storms
>>>>>>>> here, if I can get out of my driveway, I can get most anyplace.
>>>>>>>> Like anyplace else, you have to use common sense and slow down
>>>>>>>> in snow. If there is slick ice, no car is going to fare well,
>>>>>>>> no matter what tire is on it.
>>>>>>> Well, studded tires help a lot on ice. Smile Although, I haven't
>>>>>>> felt the need for studs since the 70s.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Studded tires have been banned in some states due to the damage
>>>>>> they do to roads. I know Michigan banned them. In any case I
>>>>>> never got them and never really needed them there.
>>>>>
>>>>> All true, but the fact remains that the statement about "no matter
>>>>> what tire is on it" is simply false.
>>>>
>>>> That's true, but it's a case of "the pot calling the kettle black"
>>>> considering some of the blatantly false and/or misleading statements
>>>> you've made in this thread.
>>>
>>> I have not made a single false or misleading statement.
>>
>> If you believe that, you're kidding yourself. Go back and read the
>> nonsense you've written.
>
> Point out even one false or misleading statement I have made.

I've already pointed out numerous times that your blanket claim that
winter tires wear faster is blatantly false. You also asserted that they
were uncomfortably noisy, which is also false or at least misleading, as
you were equating them to your truck tires, which are another animal
entirely. You have fabricated statements and attributed them to me at
least twice. I could go on, but I'm not going to waste my time, as it's
evident that that you're willing to lie just to make a point and you
have no credibility.
 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Matt Whiting

External


Since: Apr 14, 2005
Posts: 804



(Msg. 67) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Brian Nystrom wrote:
> Matt Whiting wrote:
>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>>>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>>>>> Darby OGill wrote:
>>>>>>> "> Depends where you live. In mid-Michigan (Lansing area),
>>>>>>> keeping an extra set
>>>>>>>> of tires just for snow couldn't be justified by most drivers.
>>>>>>>> And accordingly, it's not a very common practice. Maybe in
>>>>>>>> upper Michigan where they get clobbered by lake-effect snow but
>>>>>>>> not the rest of the state.
>>>>>>> I know what your saying, but it brings to mind something my
>>>>>>> mother used to say about cars..."It doesn't cost anymore to keep
>>>>>>> the tank full as it does empty" Once you've bought the snows and
>>>>>>> cheap steel wheels, it doesn't cost any more to employ them.
>>>>>>> Miles put on snows are miles not put on regular tires....BTW how
>>>>>>> many of us use summer tires as opposed to all season radials, and
>>>>>>> is anyone troiubled by that performance compromise (wet weather,
>>>>>>> braking and handling). There, I'm done beating the dead
>>>>>>> horse<grin>.....I guess the group does largely agree on one
>>>>>>> thing- The OP faulting Hyundai is mostly without merit.(I think
>>>>>>> the touchy throttle observation was a good one though)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And it does cost more to use snow tires. They wear much faster
>>>>>> than an all-season or summer tire so every mile put on a snow tire
>>>>>> is more costly than a mile put on an all-season or summer tire.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's simply not true and since you haven't used any in over 30
>>>>> years, you have nothing to base that conclusion on.
>>>>
>>>> It simply is true:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/tires-auto-parts/tires/tire-so...r-winte
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.consumersearch.com/www/automotive/snow-tires/review.html
>>>
>>> Did you even read either of these articles??? Here's the first
>>> paragraph from the second one:
>>
>> Yes, I read them both.
>>
>>
>>> "Even if your car has traction control or an ABS braking system,
>>> those features won't improve traction on snow and ice. Experts at The
>>> Tire Rack say only snow tires will actually improve grip on snow and
>>> ice. Although all-wheel-drive or front-wheel-drive is an advantage,
>>> you'll still improve safety by swapping your summer or all-season
>>> tires for winter ones. This is because snow tires have special tread
>>> designs that help them bite into the snow. Snow tires also use a
>>> softer rubber compound, so they stay flexible at lower temperatures."
>>>
>>> That certainly doesn't support your anti-winter tire assertions.
>>
>> I've never made an anti-winter tire assertion. I'm not against them,
>> I've said they are better than all-season tires in snow and ice, but
>> I've also said that all-seasons are more than adequate for my needs
>> and thus I don't need winter tires.
>
> Fair enough, but you certainly are going out of your way to rationalize
> that decision and discourage others from trying winter tires.
>
>>>> Winter tires lack the tread wear rating for a reason.
>>>
>>> They lack a tread wear rating because they're not designed for
>>> year-round use.
>>
>> And because they wear so quickly consumers would be shocked at the
>> numbers.
>
> More BS from you, Matt? My tires are wearing quite slowly. Please do
> explain why so we can all be enlightened.

I don't know how you drive nor what kind of tires you have so I have no
way to explain it.


>>>> I also said I haven't used snow tires on my CARS in over 30 years,
>>>> but I do use them on my snow plow truck and they wear MUCH faster
>>>> than all-season tires.
>>>
>>> On your truck I can believe it, but on cars it's not true, at least
>>> not in the absolute terms you proclaim. I can give you a perfect
>>> example, the tires on my Elantra. The car is an '04 and I've driven
>>> both sets of tires for four seasons (the winter season isn't over
>>> yet, but it's close enough). My summer tires - the stock Michelins
>>> that came on the car - are completely worn out and must be replaced.
>>> Actually, they really should have been replaced before last season,
>>> but they just passed inspection. In contrast, my winter tires still
>>> have 2/3 of their original depth. They will last at least another
>>> season and perhaps two.
>>
>> Tires wear by the mile not by the season.
>
> Gee, no kidding? If it makes you feel any better, I drive the same
> distances year round, in the same manner and mostly highway miles. I
> typically use my summer tires ~20% more than my winter tires, which is
> nowhere near enough to explain the increased wear. Your blanket
> statement about tire wear is obviously, blatantly false, but you
> apparently can't deal with being wrong.

So, as I expected, your mileage per year on your summer tires is NOT the
same as your winter tires as you implied in your comparison. I provided
several references that indicate that winter tires wear more rapidly
than all-season tires. You have provided nothing but your opinion to
the contrary. Sorry, that isn't even close to data.


>>>> Winter tire design and
>>>>> rubber formulations have changed considerably. While it's true that
>>>>> they use softer tread compounds than some "all season tires",
>>>>> they're quite durable in the colder winter temperatures they're
>>>>> designed for. They're often MORE durable that typical soft summer
>>>>> "performance" compounds. My winter tires last at least as many
>>>>> seasons as my summer tires and they typically cost less. Once you
>>>>> amortize the cost of the extra set of wheels, it's all gravy (I had
>>>>> one set of wheels that I used on four cars between '84 and '04).
>>>>> Unless one drives aggressively year-round when on dry pavement,
>>>>> there is no significant downside to winter tires. There ARE
>>>>> significant safety and performance advantages to them in nasty
>>>>> winter conditions. There isn't any inconvenience, either. As Darby
>>>>> pointed out, instead of rotating your tires twice per year (which
>>>>> we should be doing anyway), you just swap from summers to winters
>>>>> and vice versa - rotating them whenever they're reinstalled, of
>>>>> course. If making the switch forces people to rotate their tires
>>>>> when they might not do it otherwise, their summer tires will last
>>>>> longer and they'll actually see some cost saving from it.
>>>>
>>>> I have no doubt that snow tires will outlast performance summer
>>>> tires as they have VERY soft compounds and absolutely lousy tread
>>>> life. However, they will not outwear a good all-season tire, not
>>>> even close. Post even one credible reference that suggests otherwise.
>>>
>>> Obviously, you're wrong, as the results on my car prove. I don't need
>>> a reference, I have the tires to prove it. If it makes you happy,
>>> I'll send you pictures of both. Your argument is simply a fabrication
>>> to support your bias against winter tires.
>>
>> You haven't provided any data to prove anything. You have provided no
>> mileages for the life of any tires, just "seasons" which is irrelevant.
>
> See the details above. You're wrong, get over it.

You provided nothing but your opinion. Sorry, you are wrong, get over it.


>>>>> Frankly, most of the arguments against winter tires - for people
>>>>> who live in climates where they're justified - really boil down to
>>>>> one of three things:
>>>>>
>>>>> - I don't want to
>>>>>
>>>>> - I don't care
>>>>>
>>>>> - I'm too cheap
>>>>
>>>> No, they boil down to "I don't need them." It is as simple as that.
>>>>
>>>> A question for you, do you drive only all-wheel drive vehicles?
>>>
>>> Don't change the subject. I've already covered that ground in another
>>> post.
>>
>> You aren't consistent. If you want the best possible performance,
>> then you must drive AWD along with your snow tires. If you aren't
>> driving AWD vehicles, then you are settling for less than the best.
>
> Please show me where I ever said that I wanted the "best possible
> performance". You made that up, which is pretty lame, Matt.
>
> Everything to do with automotive performance is a compromise. When it
> comes to dealing with winter conditions, I draw the line at spending
> thousands of extra dollars for AWD or 4WD vehicles and thousands more in
> increased fuel, insurance and maintenance costs to gain a marginal
> improvement in acceleration traction in winter conditions (AWD/4WD does
> nothing to improve braking or cornering in slippery conditions). I'm far
> more concerned with being able to turn and stop than I am with
> accelerating or getting stuck (I've only gotten stuck - briefly - in
> snow once in the past 30 years, and that was because I tried to drive
> though 18" of it in an un-plowed parking lot). The poor handling and
> high center of gravity of many SUVs - particularly those that are truck
> based - is arguably more likely to cause an accident than their AWD/4WD
> systems are to prevent one. IMO, most SUV drivers would be better off
> with a car that inherently handles better, equipped with four winter
> tires. The environment would be better off too, but that's another
> discussion entirely.

You are again wrong on virtually all counts. The gain in acceleration
and ability to go through deep snow provided by AWD is substantial as
compared the winter tires on FWD. I believe it was the Consumer Reports
link that gave the figures here, but I realize that you value your own
opinion over real data.

It is also patently false to say that AWD/4WD does nothing to add
cornering. A tire has only so much tractive force available to handle
all demands placed on it: acceleration and maintaining forward speed
(rearward force), cornering (side force) and deceleration (frontward
force). A car that is driven by only two wheels is requiring those two
tires to transfer both the full rearward force required to keep the car
moving at a steady speed in a corner as well as the side force required.
And since FWD cars typically have 60% or more of their weight on the
driving wheels, this puts a substantial burden on those two tires.
Transferring half of the required rearward force to the rear tires gives
the front tires additional margin which provides more side force and
thus more cornering capability. This is simple physics and well
understood by most automotive engineers, rally car drivers, and people
like me who drive FWD and 4WD vehicles every week all winter long.

You are mostly correct with regard to braking, but even then not
completely correct for two reasons:

1. Most AWD/4WD vehicles have a more favorable weight distribution as
compared to FWD vehicles and the relatively greater weight on the rear
wheels allows them to better share the braking force and thus deliver
more braking force.

2. My 4WD truck has no ABS, but the direct connection at the transfer
case coupled with the locking differential means that rear wheels won't
lock up and skid until at least one front wheel is also locked. This is
a great advantage over a RWD truck where the rear wheels can lock under
very light braking effort when on slick roads. My truck thus stops much
better in 4WD than in 2WD (which is RWD).


> You and I apparently draw the line at different point and that's fine.
> However, your fabrication of bogus disadvantages to winter tires in an
> effort to justify your position is just plain pathetic.

I have not asserted a single bogus disadvantage to winter tires. Some
of the disadvantages they have are as follows and as documented in
several independent links I have provided. You have provided NOT A
SINGLE independent reference, just your opinion. The arrogance of that
is astounding.

Some winter tire disadvantages:

1. Must make two extra tire changes each year or must buy an extra set
of rims and make two wheel changes a year.

2. Poorer tread life.

3. Poorer performance on dry pavement (which is what exists MOST of the
year even in the snow belt regions. In PA and NY, it is rare to have
snow or ice on the public roads for more than a couple hours after a
storm is over. Given that most snow storms last less than 24 hours,
that means maybe 26 hours of snowy/slushy roads per storm. Given that
we get at most one snow per week on average, and typically more like one
every 2-4 weeks, that means that the conditions where winter tires excel
exist for at most 26/168 = 15% of the time and more typically 5% of the
time. I simply choose to use tires that perform better 95% of the time
rather than 5% of the time. Pretty simple logic, eh? Smile

So, which of the above is bogus? And it only counts if you can provide
a legitimate and independent reference that refutes what I wrote. The
"it is bogus because I say it is bogus" line or argument simply carries
no weight.

MAtt
 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Matt Whiting

External


Since: Apr 14, 2005
Posts: 804



(Msg. 68) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Brian Nystrom wrote:
> Matt Whiting wrote:
>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>>>> Mike Marlow wrote:
>>>>>> It's not all about being able to take off. It's also about being
>>>>>> able to stop, avoid, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's exactly my point. Snow tires improve performance in ALL of
>>>>> those categories in bad conditions.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Saying you need snow tires is like saying you need all-wheel
>>>>>>> drive. All-wheel drive is better than FWD, but that doesn't mean
>>>>>>> that every NEEDS it. Same with snow tires.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it's not like that at all. The truth is that very few people
>>>>> actually NEED 4WD or AWD, they just THINK they do. They perceive
>>>>> benefits that simply aren't there and ignore the downsides.
>>>>>
>>>>> What people actually need is better traction in a vehicle that
>>>>> handles well. FWD and AWD are not a guarantee of the former, since
>>>>> the tires are at least as large of a factor as the drive system,
>>>>> and they're a definite disadvantage when it come to handling,
>>>>> except in the case of some higher-end AWD systems in cars.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Which leaves unturned, that huge stone that attempts to argue that
>>>>>> since 4WD will take off better in snow, move through snow better
>>>>>> with 7 1/2 feet of steel sticking off the nose, and in fact push
>>>>>> the weight of that snow ahead of that 7 1/2 feet of steel, that
>>>>>> 4WD must be better in snow. There are downsides to the confidence
>>>>>> that falsely creeps into people's minds when there are niche
>>>>>> benefits to things.
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely! It's what convinces people to spend thousands of extra
>>>>> dollars on vehicles that are no better in the snow - and often
>>>>> worse - than a FWD car with a few hundred dollars worth of snow
>>>>> tires on it. It's also what makes them feel invincible enough to
>>>>> drive like idiots in bad conditions and ultimately end up off the
>>>>> road on their roofs.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/new-cars/news/2005/winter-driv...-405-wi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You didn't read this one either, did you? It supports my assertions
>>> much more than yours.
>>
>> Yes, I read it and it supports my assertions just fine.
>>
>> What part of "The best were the all-wheel-drive cars, which reached
>> almost 20 mph sooner, on average, than the front-drive cars equipped
>> with winter tires." didn't you understand?
>
> I understand that they accelerate faster, but what part of "Better
> traction won't guarantee shorter stops. Braking distances on ice were
> about the same for the all-wheel- and front-wheel-drive cars." didn't
> you understand? As far as I'm concerned, acceleration is a minor
> consideration and it's meaningless if you can't stop or turn. AWD/4WD
> does nothing to help either and 4WD systems can actually increase
> stopping distances and adversely affect cornering if the hubs are
> locked. Look it up, Matt.

If I can't get out of my driveway, then stopping is irrelevant. I just
gave you a long post detailing when AWD helps and when it doesn't, and
it helps in almost every condition except braking. However, 4WD can
even help in braking.

Why do you want me to do your homework for you? Couldn't find it either
and hoping my search skills are better than yours? Smile


> You also ignored this paragraph: "Winter tires yielded the biggest
> snow-traction gain for the buck, however. Using them helped the
> front-drive cars reach 20 mph nearly 28 feet sooner than they did with
> all-season tires. Cost: about $400 for four winter tires plus another
> $200 or so for an extra set of wheel rims to ease the switch to winter
> tires."
>
> Gee, I wonder who's been saying that all along?

I didn't ignore and had no reason to. I agree with it. I've simply
said that most people don't NEED more traction and thus ANY additional
cost is a waste of money. Moreover, winter tires are WORSE in the
conditions that prevail MOST of the time - dry roads.


>> And what part of "Our advice. Consider an all-wheel-drive vehicle if
>> you live in a snowy area or want added peace of mind. For maximum
>> traction, equip it with winter tires. In less-snowy areas, front-wheel
>> drive and a set of winter tires should suffice. Mount winter tires on
>> all four wheels for balanced handling. Remove them after winter, since
>> these tires wear quickly on dry roads (plan on about three winters of
>> use). And be sure to opt for ABS on any vehicle." didn't you catch?
>>
>> AWD is best in snowy areas. Winter tires should SUFFICE (emphasis
>> added so you can't miss it) in less-snow areas. "These tires
>> (referring to winter tires) WEAR QUICKLY on dry roads. Again,
>> emphasis added since you missed this the first time around.
>
> Winter tires DO suffice and they perform better than ASRs, exactly as
> the article states. If I lived in an area where deep snow was common and
> AWD was truly needed (the risk of getting stuck was high), I'd own an
> AWD vehicle and as the article recommends, I'd equip it with snow tires,
> too. I don't seen any benefit to AWD with ASRs compared to front-drive
> with snow tires for the type of conditions I typically face.
> Acceleration is the least important factor in winter driving safety and
> again, you don't gain anything in stopping or cornering with AWD. The
> fact that it accelerates better creates a belief in drivers that
> traction is better than it actually is and the result is many of them
> get in trouble. OTOH, snow tires improve ALL aspects of performance in
> slippery conditions. Shame on Consumer Reports for not testing cornering
> and braking, as it would shed an entirely different light on the subject.

Acceleration may be the least important parameter purely for safety, but
that isn't true for utility. If I can't get out of my driveway and up
the hills, then being able to stop isn't even a consideration. And I
handle the stopping very simply by not following too closely. I've
driven in winter conditions for more than 30 years with ASR tires and
have never rear-ended another vehicle or hit something because I
couldn't stop in time.

Matt
 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Matt Whiting

External


Since: Apr 14, 2005
Posts: 804



(Msg. 69) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Brian Nystrom wrote:
> Matt Whiting wrote:
>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>> Mike Marlow wrote:
>>>> "Brian Nystrom" <brian.nystrom RemoveThis @verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:I5Axj.4517$A93.4348@trndny08...
>>>>
>>>>> You can't simply make a blanket statement like that, as there are
>>>>> dramatic differences in performance among the myriad tires labeled
>>>>> as "all season". As I said before, I drive a lot of rental cars and
>>>>> I've had to use many of them in snow and most of the performance of
>>>>> the tires on them have range from "reasonably acceptible" to
>>>>> "downright dangerous". NONE of them have been what I would call
>>>>> good performers in snow, compared to my winter tires. Keep in mind
>>>>> that all of these cars have had relatively low mileage on them, so
>>>>> the tires with in good shape. Whether you believe it or not, the
>>>>> difference IS quite substantial.
>>>>
>>>> I do agree that there are a ton of what I consider to be pure junk
>>>> ASR's out there. Mainly in the touring tire category. It's not
>>>> hard to find a nice soft, quiet tire that is junk in any condition
>>>> other than cruising down dry interstates. They hydroplane badly,
>>>> they corner badly, and they are as useless as slicks in the snow.
>>>
>>> That's exactly what my experience has been.
>>>
>>>> That said - I've had no trouble finding perfectly acceptable ASR's
>>>> that serve me well year round.
>>>
>>> I certainly wish the cars I've been forced to drive had something
>>> like that on them. I have yet to find ANY ASR that comes close to the
>>> performance of winter tires in snow. I have to wonder if you might
>>> think differently if you had the chance to do back-to-back
>>> comparisons on the same car(s), as I have? That always seems to be
>>> the stumbling block with most people. As I've said before, the people
>>> I've convinced to try winter tires have ALL been stunned at the
>>> difference. Essentially, they didn't realize what they were missing,
>>> which is understandable. Tire companies have done a great job of
>>> selling the "all season" myth.
>>
>> There is no myth so it must have been a REALLY hard sell!
>
> Wow Matt, that's a really strong argument! You must have been the star
> of your high school debate team.

It sure beats your "I'm Brian and this is my opinion therefore it must
be fact" line of argument. You have yet to provide a SINGLE independent
reference in support of any of your claims. I rest my case.

Actually, I was a very good member of my high school debate team. Then
again, in a real debate your "it is true because I say it is true" line
of argument simply isn't accepted. Only independent references are
acceptable. It is obviously that you weren't even on a debate team in
high school.

Matt
 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Matt Whiting

External


Since: Apr 14, 2005
Posts: 804



(Msg. 70) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Brian Nystrom wrote:
> Matt Whiting wrote:
>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>>>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No, most of the people in the snow belt are like me and simply
>>>>>> don't need snow tires. I did a quick search and was not able to
>>>>>> find any detailed figures on USA tire sales by type, but I'll bet
>>>>>> my 2% figure isn't far off as the fraction of total tire sales
>>>>>> annually that are winter tires.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sales statistics are no indicator of need or efficacy, simply of
>>>>> buying trends. A good example of that is the large percentage of
>>>>> people that buy SUVs vs. how many actually have a real need for
>>>>> one. I could easily argue that less than 2% of drivers have any
>>>>> real need for an SUV. I could also reasonably argue that many - if
>>>>> not most - SUV buyers would be better off in many ways if they
>>>>> bought a car and a set of snow tires instead of an SUV.
>>>>
>>>> Neither is your opinion about snow tires any indicator of need or
>>>> efficiency or tread life.
>>>
>>> If it were merely an opinion, that would be true. I have the
>>> experiences to back it up.
>>
>> Your experiences are only the basis for your opinion. Many more of us
>> have experiences exactly counter to yours. I assert that the odds are
>> very high then that the majority of us are correct and you are not
>> when you assert that everyone needs winter tires.
>
> Please Matt, do tell us how many cars you've done back-to-back
> comparisons of ASRs (or summer tires) with winter tires. I've done it on
> 6 vehicles with three brands of winter tires and at least 6 or 7 brands
> of ASRs. While that's hardly the "test to end all tests", it's a lot
> more credible than simply spewing "ASRs work well enough" over and over
> again, and making up bogus disadvantages for winter tires, with no
> comparative experience whatsoever.
>
> I never once said that "everyone" needs winter tires. That's just
> another of your pathetic attempts to discredit my position by making
> things up.
>
> As for being in the minority, I have no problem with that, as the
> majority is not necessarily right, they just have other priorities, as I
> alluded to earlier. Perhaps I should have added "I don't want to hear
> it." and "I'm too stubborn to listen to reason." to my previous list. Wink
>
> I have no problem with us disagreeing on the need for winter tires.
> We're both big boys and we can make our own choices. However, if you're
> going to try to justify your position by posting false or misleading
> information and outright fabrications, I'm going to call you on it. This
> could have been a useful debate that presented both sides and helped
> others reading it make informed decisions, but sadly, it's become just
> another internet pissing contest.

Again, for at least the 3rd time, provide even a SINGLE reference that
shows that a SINGLE thing I've written was false or misleading. If you
can't, then there is nothing to "call me" on.

Matt
 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Matt Whiting

External


Since: Apr 14, 2005
Posts: 804



(Msg. 71) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Brian Nystrom wrote:
> Matt Whiting wrote:
>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>>>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>>>>> DonC wrote:
>>>>>>> "Matt Whiting" <whiting DeleteThis @epix.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:06Kwj.88$555.1273@news1.epix.net...
>>>>>>>> Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Brian Nystrom" <brian.nystrom DeleteThis @verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not against snow tires at all, I just don't need them ...
>>>>>>>>>>> like 98% of the rest of the folks in the USA. There are 2%
>>>>>>>>>>> who need them and they should buy and use them.
>>>>>>>>>> Considering how much of the country lies in the "snow belt",
>>>>>>>>>> that's a pretty ridiculous statement.
>>>>>>>>> Maybe not. Back in the 50's, I remember putting full chains on
>>>>>>>>> my father's car for the first couple of days after a snow.
>>>>>>>>> Main roads were poorly plowed, side streets were not plowed at
>>>>>>>>> all. We lived in Philadelphia and a 6" snow was a lot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've since moved to Connecticut and 10" to 12" is common. I've
>>>>>>>>> never thought about snow tires. Why? They plow frequently,
>>>>>>>>> they plow well, they treat the streets. In the worst storms
>>>>>>>>> here, if I can get out of my driveway, I can get most
>>>>>>>>> anyplace. Like anyplace else, you have to use common sense and
>>>>>>>>> slow down in snow. If there is slick ice, no car is going to
>>>>>>>>> fare well, no matter what tire is on it.
>>>>>>>> Well, studded tires help a lot on ice. Smile Although, I haven't
>>>>>>>> felt the need for studs since the 70s.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Studded tires have been banned in some states due to the damage
>>>>>>> they do to roads. I know Michigan banned them. In any case I
>>>>>>> never got them and never really needed them there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All true, but the fact remains that the statement about "no matter
>>>>>> what tire is on it" is simply false.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's true, but it's a case of "the pot calling the kettle black"
>>>>> considering some of the blatantly false and/or misleading
>>>>> statements you've made in this thread.
>>>>
>>>> I have not made a single false or misleading statement.
>>>
>>> If you believe that, you're kidding yourself. Go back and read the
>>> nonsense you've written.
>>
>> Point out even one false or misleading statement I have made.
>
> I've already pointed out numerous times that your blanket claim that
> winter tires wear faster is blatantly false. You also asserted that they
> were uncomfortably noisy, which is also false or at least misleading, as
> you were equating them to your truck tires, which are another animal
> entirely. You have fabricated statements and attributed them to me at
> least twice. I could go on, but I'm not going to waste my time, as it's
> evident that that you're willing to lie just to make a point and you
> have no credibility.

I posted references that state that winter tires wear more rapidly than
ASRs. Where is your reference that they don't?

I said they were noisy on my truck and they are and I can find
references to noise as well, but since you don't accept any facts that
conflict with your opinion, I'm done doing your homework for you.

Matt
 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
esp1

External


Since: Jan 01, 2005
Posts: 601



(Msg. 72) Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Once this contest is over, what happens to all the urine it generated?
Yellow ice?
 >> Stay informed about: Hyundai preformance on icy raods 
Back to top
Login to vote
Brian Nystrom

External


Since: May 17, 2005
Posts: 436



(Msg. 73) Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Hyundai preformance on icy raods [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Matt Whiting wrote:
> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>>>> Brian Nystrom wrote:
>>>>>> Mike Marlow wrote:
>>>>>>> It's not all about being able to take off. It's also about being
>>>>>>> able to stop, avoid, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's exactly my point. Snow tires improve performance in ALL of
>>>>>> those categories in bad conditions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Saying you need snow tires is like saying you need all-wheel
>>>>>>>> drive. All-wheel drive is better than FWD, but that doesn't mean
>>>>>>>> that every NEEDS it. Same with snow tires.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, it's not like that at all. The truth is that very few people
>>>>>> actually NEED 4WD or AWD, they just THINK they do. They perceive
>>>>>> benefits that simply aren't there and ignore the downsides.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What people actually need is better traction in a vehicle that
>>>>>> handles well. FWD and AWD are not a guarantee of the former, since
>>>>>> the tires are at least as large o