Waterproof Cover TL

Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was
hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience.

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:39:44 -0700, I. Care <icare.DeleteThis@spamthis.com>
wrote:

>In article <em4f14tvbnr2ij5fedfk5fiu001esrsg9u.DeleteThis@4ax.com>, we.DeleteThis@qw.net
>says...
>> Any suggestions for a waterproof cover for an 07 TL, for under $100?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>A simple Google search revealed:
>
>$101.95 That's almost under $100!!
>
>http://www.autoanything.com/car-covers/20A10004A1.aspx
>
>$82.87 Fair outdoor protection
>
>http://www.carcoversdirect.com/products/car_truck_covers/4/car_cover/rea
>dy_fit/ACURA/2007/TL//3/
>
>short ver: http://tinyurl.com/435qph
>
>2 Outdoor covers under $100
>
>http://www.global-accessories.com/products/index.phtml?
>prod_id=wolfcovers&cust_id=zq4mw&SYSTEM=storelink&SESSIONID=none&ACTION=
>
>Short Ver: http://tinyurl.com/4sazlv
>
>Hope that helps.
 >> Stay informed about: Waterproof Cover TL 

Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of
"a Google search found..."?

That is absurd.

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:41:48 GMT, Larry in AZ
<usenet2.RemoveThis@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:

>Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we.RemoveThis@qw.net> said:
>
>> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was
>> hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience.
>
>You didn't say that...
 >> Stay informed about: Waterproof Cover TL 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Waterproof Cover TL 

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:57:24 -0400, Luca <we.TakeThisOut@qw.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:41:48 GMT, Larry in AZ
><usenet2.TakeThisOut@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:
>
>>Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we.TakeThisOut@qw.net> said:
>>
>>> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was
>>> hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience.
>>
>>You didn't say that...

>Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of
>"a Google search found..."?
>
>That is absurd.

<top posting cluelessness fixed>

What is even more absurd is that it apparently didn't occur to you to
use Google to search for *opinions* about products, as well as the
products themselves.

Now, that *is* absurd.
--
Dan.
 >> Stay informed about: Waterproof Cover TL 

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:18:05 -0400, Dean Dark
<ddrake DeleteThis @comcast.notthis.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:57:24 -0400, Luca <we DeleteThis @qw.net> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:41:48 GMT, Larry in AZ
>><usenet2 DeleteThis @DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Waiving the right to remain silent, Luca <we DeleteThis @qw.net> said:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, I have done numerous searches and looked at many online. I was
>>>> hoping for some recommendations based on usage/experience.
>>>
>>>You didn't say that...
>
>>Well if I was asking for suggestions, why would I want a suggestion of
>>"a Google search found..."?
>>
>>That is absurd.
>
><top posting cluelessness fixed>
>
>What is even more absurd is that it apparently didn't occur to you to
>use Google to search for *opinions* about products, as well as the
>products themselves.
>
>Now, that *is* absurd.


And how did you arrive at that conclusion?

Maybe I wanted more opinions than I found by Googling...you think
maybe that could be the case?
 >> Stay informed about: Waterproof Cover TL 

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:45:22 -0400, Luca <we.RemoveThis@qw.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:18:05 -0400, Dean Dark
><ddrake.RemoveThis@comcast.notthis.net> wrote:
>
>>What is even more absurd is that it apparently didn't occur to you to
>>use Google to search for *opinions* about products, as well as the
>>products themselves.
>>
>>Now, that *is* absurd.
>
>And how did you arrive at that conclusion?
>
>Maybe I wanted more opinions than I found by Googling...you think
>maybe that could be the case?

As an earlier post by someone else said, "you didn't say that."

Maybe it could be the case that you should learn from this little
episode that you could do *much* better in how you frame your
questions?

Being explicit is likely to be way more productive than expecting the
rest of us to be mucking findreaders...

HTH, HAND, etc.
--
Dan.
 >> Stay informed about: Waterproof Cover TL 

On Thu, 01 May 2008 06:17:32 -0400, Luca <we RemoveThis @qw.net> wrote:

>Now that you all know what I am asking and what actions I have already
>taken, let's see just how productive you can be in terms of my
>original question.

I think it would better motivate people to help you if you could be
just a bit more condescending than that...
--
Dan.
 >> Stay informed about: Waterproof Cover TL 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Waterproof Cover TL