rmiller wrote:
> Hi, I'm doing a swap of a 97 Accord F22B1 for a H23A1 into my 95
> Prelude. I was going to replace the timing belt on the F22 since
> that's what broke on the H23 and I think it's been done already.
>
> The reason I say this is the lower cover has a hole in it from the
> belt rubbing. It looks like the cover was never (re)installed
> correctly and the top edge around the crankshaft pulley wasn't seated
> behind the pully but was in front, hence the rub of the belt.
>
> My buddy says not to replace the cover and that this problem even
> exists on engines as they leave the factory.
no, the cover is there for a reason. all kinds of junk blows up under
the hood from time to time. you don't want sticks or stones getting
lodged in the timing belt.
the only people that run without covers are those into adjustable cam
timing, or who want to show off their colored aluminum cam gears.
>
> I wanted to get some more opinions before I decide.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanx
>
> RJ >> Stay informed about: Timing Belt Cover - do I need to replace it?