 |
|
 |
|
Next: Sierra Antifreeze/Coolant
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Oct 18, 2004 Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:40 pm
Post subject: Duramax mod suggestions Archived from groups: alt>trucks>chevy (more info?)
|
|
|
My Duramax has 12k on it now and I am starting to think of ways I can
maximize fuel savings, etc. All I have done so far is put a K&N air
filter in it. Some tell me to put a chip on it, others to go after the
breathing angle, still others the exhaust system. I'd be interested to
hear what this group might have to say about what THEY would do if it
were their truck. Thanks!
(PS... I don't really NEED more power and pep from the truck, but if I
could get better mileage AND more zip, well...)
--
"Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly
impossible."
-Edwin Land >> Stay informed about: Duramax mod suggestions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 12, 2004 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 6:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Duramax mod suggestions [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Have you run the numbers to see if you will ever recoup the cost of the mods
in fuel savings? Doubtful that you will.
"Robert" <ireland.TakeThisOut@blazenet.net> wrote in message
news:4194ED42.7EA91276@blazenet.net...
> My Duramax has 12k on it now and I am starting to think of ways I can
> maximize fuel savings, etc. All I have done so far is put a K&N air
> filter in it. Some tell me to put a chip on it, others to go after the
> breathing angle, still others the exhaust system. I'd be interested to
> hear what this group might have to say about what THEY would do if it
> were their truck. Thanks!
>
> (PS... I don't really NEED more power and pep from the truck, but if I
> could get better mileage AND more zip, well...)
>
> --
> "Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly
> impossible."
>
> -Edwin Land
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Duramax mod suggestions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 05, 2004 Posts: 35
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Duramax mod suggestions [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Sigwings2" <oreois RemoveThis @IHATESPAMcomcast.net> wrote in message
news:0qald.399315$D%.3540@attbi_s51...
> Have you run the numbers to see if you will ever recoup the cost of the
mods
> in fuel savings? Doubtful that you will.
>
>
> "Robert" <ireland RemoveThis @blazenet.net> wrote in message
> news:4194ED42.7EA91276@blazenet.net...
> > My Duramax has 12k on it now and I am starting to think of ways I can
> > maximize fuel savings, etc. All I have done so far is put a K&N air
> > filter in it. Some tell me to put a chip on it, others to go after the
> > breathing angle, still others the exhaust system. I'd be interested to
> > hear what this group might have to say about what THEY would do if it
> > were their truck. Thanks!
> >
> > (PS... I don't really NEED more power and pep from the truck, but if I
> > could get better mileage AND more zip, well...)
> >
> > --
> > "Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly
> > impossible."
> >
> > -Edwin Land
> >
> >
>
> i've heard good things about the Banks 6 gun bundle as well as products
from Edge and Bullydog....personally i think im going with Banks cuz he's
sorta the Guru when it comes to Diesel performance....but just in case
....heres a couple urls fer ya too look at...hope they help ya some
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.edgeproducts.com/" target="_blank">http://www.edgeproducts.com/</a>
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.bankspower.com/" target="_blank">http://www.bankspower.com/</a>
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.bullydog.com" target="_blank">http://www.bullydog.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Duramax mod suggestions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 07, 2004 Posts: 107
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Duramax mod suggestions [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Robert" <ireland.RemoveThis@blazenet.net> wrote in message
news:4194ED42.7EA91276@blazenet.net...
> My Duramax has 12k on it now and I am starting to think of ways I can
> maximize fuel savings, etc. All I have done so far is put a K&N air
> filter in it. Some tell me to put a chip on it, others to go after the
> breathing angle, still others the exhaust system. I'd be interested to
> hear what this group might have to say about what THEY would do if it
> were their truck. Thanks!
>
> (PS... I don't really NEED more power and pep from the truck, but if I
> could get better mileage AND more zip, well...)
>
> --
> "Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and
nearly
> impossible."
>
> -Edwin Land
>
>
Gee you mean that extra HP from the K&N isn't enough?
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.newsfeeds.com" target="_blank">http://www.newsfeeds.com</a> The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Duramax mod suggestions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 19, 2004 Posts: 133
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Duramax mod suggestions [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Just my not-so-humble opinion, but I'd stay away from any sort of oil
impregnated air filter. They are notorious for providing less filtration
than standard paper and have a history of contaminating sensors on your
motor with oil mist. No thanks.
I don't know that you're going to do much better on fuel economy with
expensive add-ons and be able to recoup the cost through fuel savings.
Personally, I think you should stick with some of the absolute basics, like
a good synthetic oil regularly changed, fresh air and fuel filters, and even
a secondary fuel filter that screens particles down to 2 microns so the fuel
is as clean as it can be by the time it hits your injection pump and
injectors. That's all I've done to my '04 Silverado with the Duramax and
Allison, and my mileage check just this morning at the pump was 18.8mpg in
mostly city driving.
In addition, conservative driving habits will have a much more positive
affect on your overall mileage than almost anything else.
Cheers - Jonathan
--
Jonathan A. Race
Lieutenant, EMS Supervisor
Orange County (FL) Fire Rescue Department
(This message may contain personal opinions and/or information not related
to my employment or employer)
"Robert" <ireland DeleteThis @blazenet.net> wrote in message
news:4194ED42.7EA91276@blazenet.net...
> My Duramax has 12k on it now and I am starting to think of ways I can
> maximize fuel savings, etc. All I have done so far is put a K&N air
> filter in it. Some tell me to put a chip on it, others to go after the
> breathing angle, still others the exhaust system. I'd be interested to
> hear what this group might have to say about what THEY would do if it
> were their truck. Thanks!
>
> (PS... I don't really NEED more power and pep from the truck, but if I
> could get better mileage AND more zip, well...)
>
> --
> "Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly
> impossible."
>
> -Edwin Land
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Duramax mod suggestions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 18, 2004 Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 1:28 am
Post subject: Re: Duramax mod suggestions [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Jonathan,
Could you provide some background references for your comments on oil
impregnated filters? I'd like to look into that.
Jonathan Race wrote:
> Just my not-so-humble opinion, but I'd stay away from any sort of oil
> impregnated air filter. They are notorious for providing less filtration
> than standard paper and have a history of contaminating sensors on your
> motor with oil mist. No thanks.
>
> I don't know that you're going to do much better on fuel economy with
> expensive add-ons and be able to recoup the cost through fuel savings.
> Personally, I think you should stick with some of the absolute basics, like
> a good synthetic oil regularly changed, fresh air and fuel filters, and even
> a secondary fuel filter that screens particles down to 2 microns so the fuel
> is as clean as it can be by the time it hits your injection pump and
> injectors. That's all I've done to my '04 Silverado with the Duramax and
> Allison, and my mileage check just this morning at the pump was 18.8mpg in
> mostly city driving.
>
> In addition, conservative driving habits will have a much more positive
> affect on your overall mileage than almost anything else.
>
> Cheers - Jonathan
> --
> Jonathan A. Race
> Lieutenant, EMS Supervisor
> Orange County (FL) Fire Rescue Department
>
> (This message may contain personal opinions and/or information not related
> to my employment or employer)
> "Robert" <ireland.TakeThisOut@blazenet.net> wrote in message
> news:4194ED42.7EA91276@blazenet.net...
> > My Duramax has 12k on it now and I am starting to think of ways I can
> > maximize fuel savings, etc. All I have done so far is put a K&N air
> > filter in it. Some tell me to put a chip on it, others to go after the
> > breathing angle, still others the exhaust system. I'd be interested to
> > hear what this group might have to say about what THEY would do if it
> > were their truck. Thanks!
> >
> > (PS... I don't really NEED more power and pep from the truck, but if I
> > could get better mileage AND more zip, well...)
> >
> > --
> > "Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly
> > impossible."
> >
> > -Edwin Land
> >
> >
--
"Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly
impossible."
-Edwin Land<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Duramax mod suggestions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 19, 2004 Posts: 133
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 5:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Duramax mod suggestions [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
You can search this and many other automotive newsgroups for dicussion
threads about these type of filters (mostly K&N because they are the most
popular). What it boils down to is a direct comparison of the
specifications from the manufacturers. K&N (and others) flow better -
mostly at the high end of the flow rate - but have a lower filtering
effeciency (total amount and size of particulate matter). The truth is an
ordinary paper filter still flows much more air than your vehicle will need
99% of the time and have a higher degree of filtering.
I have also read that both GM and Ford have put out bulletins limiting the
warranty on vehicles with an oil impregnated air filter installed due to the
high incidence of sensor failure from the oil mist. I don't know which - if
any - sensors would be affected on a Duramax diesel because the notice came
out for the gas motors, but that's more than enough for me. Maybe one of
the GM techs who prowl around this group can fill you in with some specifics
on this.
Cheers - Jonathan
--
Jonathan A. Race
Lieutenant, EMS Supervisor
Orange County (FL) Fire Rescue Department
(This message may contain personal opinions and/or information not related
to my employment or employer)
"Robert" <ireland RemoveThis @blazenet.net> wrote in message
news:41959B67.2AD8BFBF@blazenet.net...
> Jonathan,
>
> Could you provide some background references for your comments on oil
> impregnated filters? I'd like to look into that.
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Duramax mod suggestions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 18, 2004 Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 8:40 am
Post subject: Re: Duramax mod suggestions [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Thanks, Jonathan. I appreciate the info and will check it out.
Jonathan Race wrote:
> You can search this and many other automotive newsgroups for dicussion
> threads about these type of filters (mostly K&N because they are the most
> popular). What it boils down to is a direct comparison of the
> specifications from the manufacturers. K&N (and others) flow better -
> mostly at the high end of the flow rate - but have a lower filtering
> effeciency (total amount and size of particulate matter). The truth is an
> ordinary paper filter still flows much more air than your vehicle will need
> 99% of the time and have a higher degree of filtering.
>
> I have also read that both GM and Ford have put out bulletins limiting the
> warranty on vehicles with an oil impregnated air filter installed due to the
> high incidence of sensor failure from the oil mist. I don't know which - if
> any - sensors would be affected on a Duramax diesel because the notice came
> out for the gas motors, but that's more than enough for me. Maybe one of
> the GM techs who prowl around this group can fill you in with some specifics
> on this.
>
> Cheers - Jonathan
>
> --
> Jonathan A. Race
> Lieutenant, EMS Supervisor
> Orange County (FL) Fire Rescue Department
>
> (This message may contain personal opinions and/or information not related
> to my employment or employer)
>
> "Robert" <ireland.DeleteThis@blazenet.net> wrote in message
> news:41959B67.2AD8BFBF@blazenet.net...
> > Jonathan,
> >
> > Could you provide some background references for your comments on oil
> > impregnated filters? I'd like to look into that.
> >
--
"Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly
impossible."
-Edwin Land<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Duramax mod suggestions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 30, 2004 Posts: 20
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2004 12:40 am
Post subject: Re: Duramax mod suggestions [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Hello Robert,
My 2 cents worth... You may find just as many K&N owners who will still keep
using their products as there are detractors for such oiled non-paper
filters. High quality paper filters do a better job of filtering the finer
particles (I find a thin coating of very fine black dust on the MAF screen
of our '98 6.5TD Tahoe, and also on the inner section of air filter pan of
our '86 6.2NA Sub).
I choose to continue using the product, especially on our Tahoe, because of
the reusability feature: the design of the air intake system in the Tahoe
draws so much crap into the inner fender, the air filter gets clogged
quickly with leaves, bugs, dirt and airborne hitchhikers (e.g., dandelions).
Those drum air filters run $17-$19 and have to be replaced at each oil
change even though I rotate them to expose a clean section to the "sweet
spot."
I've tried wrapping the K&N filter with about 10 feet of surgical gauze
sprayed with K&N filter oil to see if the deposit of fine black dust is
decreased but the results are not conclusive. I was going to try wrapping a
paper filter the same way but "Doc" said the oil, if it soaks the paper,
will decrease the air flow of the filter -- may still go ahead and try it,
though.
How much damage the fine dust particulates will cause is still up for
debate. I'm more concerned with the quality of the diesel fuel the engine
ingests.
Good luck! Franko...
"Robert" <ireland.TakeThisOut@blazenet.net> wrote in message
news:419758C4.33281FA7@blazenet.net...
> Thanks, Jonathan. I appreciate the info and will check it out.
>
> Jonathan Race wrote:
>
> > You can search this and many other automotive newsgroups for dicussion
> > threads about these type of filters (mostly K&N because they are the
most
> > popular). What it boils down to is a direct comparison of the
> > specifications from the manufacturers. K&N (and others) flow better -
> > mostly at the high end of the flow rate - but have a lower filtering
> > effeciency (total amount and size of particulate matter). The truth is
an
> > ordinary paper filter still flows much more air than your vehicle will
need
> > 99% of the time and have a higher degree of filtering.
> >
> > I have also read that both GM and Ford have put out bulletins limiting
the
> > warranty on vehicles with an oil impregnated air filter installed due to
the
> > high incidence of sensor failure from the oil mist. I don't know
which - if
> > any - sensors would be affected on a Duramax diesel because the notice
came
> > out for the gas motors, but that's more than enough for me. Maybe one
of
> > the GM techs who prowl around this group can fill you in with some
specifics
> > on this.
> >
> > Cheers - Jonathan
> >
> > --
> > Jonathan A. Race
> > Lieutenant, EMS Supervisor
> > Orange County (FL) Fire Rescue Department
> >
> > (This message may contain personal opinions and/or information not
related
> > to my employment or employer)
> >
> > "Robert" <ireland.TakeThisOut@blazenet.net> wrote in message
> > news:41959B67.2AD8BFBF@blazenet.net...
> > > Jonathan,
> > >
> > > Could you provide some background references for your comments on oil
> > > impregnated filters? I'd like to look into that.
> > >
>
> --
> "Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly
> impossible."
>
> -Edwin Land
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Duramax mod suggestions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 11, 2004 Posts: 43
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 3:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Duramax mod suggestions [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I have 40,000 k on my 2004 3500 Dually,4x4,LT,LWB,Crew-Cab.
I haul campers all over the country. I can tell you for a fact a Duramax
does not need anything. I am going to run a 5 inch exaust because
several of the guys running them on their Chevy's,Dodges and Fords say
they have an increase in torque power and fuel mileage. I did talk to a
guy who has the same truck as mine and he added a 70-75 hp chip. he said
he wished he would have saved his bucks. I also have the K&N. Most of
these guys also run Lucas oil everywhere they can on their trucks. They
are all very impressed with this product. I know 2 guys that have been
using it since day one and both trucks have over 300,000. No Engine
problems to mention. One was a 1999 7.3 liter Ford Powerstroke and the
other is a 2001 Duramax... The air filter and exast is all I am doing to
mine....
Have a Great One !
Bob >> Stay informed about: Duramax mod suggestions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Duramax add ons - Pops just bought an 04 chevy with the Duramax monster in it.....he's thinkin about a performance chip add on but hes not sure which .....he's looking into one from Banks (6 gun bundle)....Edge....and another setup from Bullydog.....any suggestions??..
duramax - I'm interested in buying a ued chev, diesel but i want the duramax, Any body know what year they came out?
Duramax Diesel - I have recently purchased a 2500HD 4x4 with the Duramax Diesel & a 6sp tranny. A recent post asked about synthetic oil. I personally recommend Red Line. You can see their products at http://www.redlineoil.com/ I use their synthetic engine oil,..
Duramax during the Winter - I am considering putting a grill cover on my truck to restrict the air flow into the Duramax's radiator during the winter months. I would like to know if you consider this a good idea or a bad idea? Dave
DuraMax Suburban? - I know they used to have a Diesel in the suburban... any word on if the DuraMax might find its way into a Suburban, or Yukon XL? |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|