 |
|
 |
|
Next: 2002 Ram 2500 Loss of Power
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Aug 08, 2007 Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 6:32 pm
Post subject: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? Archived from groups: alt>autos>dodge>trucks (more info?)
|
|
|
I am not a truck person so I apologize if I don't make much sense.
Either way..... I have a 2002 Dakota V6 4x4 (SXT) that I got used
about 6 months ago. One time I overloaded the truck. When I got it
home, a smell of burning brakes(?) was coming from it. Although I
haven't done that again, when I am carrying anything of a decent
weight (400+ lbs) I smell that smell again to a certain extent.
1. What's going on?
2. What did I do?
3. How do I fix it? What do I tell the mechanic to check?
Thanks! >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 06, 2006 Posts: 116
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:06 pm
Post subject: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
marksegal.DeleteThis@optonline.net wrote:
> I am not a truck person so I apologize if I don't make much sense.
> Either way..... I have a 2002 Dakota V6 4x4 (SXT) that I got used
> about 6 months ago. One time I overloaded the truck. When I got it
> home, a smell of burning brakes(?) was coming from it. Although I
> haven't done that again, when I am carrying anything of a decent
> weight (400+ lbs) I smell that smell again to a certain extent.
>
> 1. What's going on?
> 2. What did I do?
> 3. How do I fix it? What do I tell the mechanic to check?
>
> Thanks!
>
Do you have a clutch? Brake and clutch often
smell the same.
If it is brakes, take them apart and see what they
look like. Are the pads glazed? the rotor scorched
and blued? Dirt and oil on the drums?
--
..boB
2006 FXDI hot rod
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1965 FFR Cobra - 427W EFI, Damn Fast. >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 08, 2007 Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:10 am
Post subject: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Aug 8, 11:06 pm, ".boB" <noneofyourbusin... RemoveThis @goaway.net> wrote:
> markse... RemoveThis @optonline.net wrote:
> > I am not a truck person so I apologize if I don't make much sense.
> > Either way..... I have a 2002 Dakota V6 4x4 (SXT) that I got used
> > about 6 months ago. One time I overloaded the truck. When I got it
> > home, a smell of burning brakes(?) was coming from it. Although I
> > haven't done that again, when I am carrying anything of a decent
> > weight (400+ lbs) I smell that smell again to a certain extent.
>
> > 1. What's going on?
> > 2. What did I do?
> > 3. How do I fix it? What do I tell the mechanic to check?
>
> > Thanks!
>
> Do you have a clutch? Brake and clutch often
> smell the same.
> If it is brakes, take them apart and see what they
> look like. Are the pads glazed? the rotor scorched
> and blued? Dirt and oil on the drums?
>
> --
> .boB
> 2006 FXDI hot rod
> 2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
> 1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
> 1965 FFR Cobra - 427W EFI, Damn Fast.
It is an automatic, so no clutch. It's the same type of smell though.
Another thing that I notice is, the heavier the payload, the less
travel I have on the brake pedal. I don't know if that is a safety
feature (reduction of brake time/making the brakes more sensitive).
Thanks! >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 06, 2006 Posts: 116
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:05 am
Post subject: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
marksegal.DeleteThis@optonline.net wrote:
> It is an automatic, so no clutch. It's the same type of smell though.
>
> Another thing that I notice is, the heavier the payload, the less
> travel I have on the brake pedal. I don't know if that is a safety
> feature (reduction of brake time/making the brakes more sensitive).
>
> Thanks!
>
Hmmm, that's a tough one. No built in safety
feature like that.
The only real differance between empty and loaded
is the height of the suspension. Check and see of a
line is pinched (doubtfull). Also check the emergency
brake cables. See if they are getting stretched when
loaded. That would activate the parking brake.
--
..boB
2006 FXDI hot rod
2001 Dodge Dakota QC 5.9/4x4/3.92
1966 Mustang Coupe - Daily Driver
1965 FFR Cobra - 427W EFI, Damn Fast. >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 08, 2007 Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:22 am
Post subject: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Aug 9, 11:20 am, "TBone" <tboneNOS....DeleteThis@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> ".boB" <noneofyourbusin....DeleteThis@goaway.net> wrote in message
>
> news:46bb2d8a$0$986$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com...
>
>
>
> > markse....DeleteThis@optonline.net wrote:
>
> > > It is an automatic, so no clutch. It's the same type of smell though.
>
> > > Another thing that I notice is, the heavier the payload, the less
> > > travel I have on the brake pedal. I don't know if that is a safety
> > > feature (reduction of brake time/making the brakes more sensitive).
>
> > > Thanks!
>
> > Hmmm, that's a tough one. No built in safety
> > feature like that.
> > The only real differance between empty and loaded
> > is the height of the suspension. Check and see of a
> > line is pinched (doubtfull). Also check the emergency
> > brake cables. See if they are getting stretched when
> > loaded. That would activate the parking brake.
>
> I would also look at the rear axles and bearings.
>
> --
> If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
LOL! Love the tag at the end!
I like the parking brake idea mentioned as it would fit the smell
issue. Now I will show real ignorance here.... Would issues with the
axles/bearings cause a smell when put under stress? I would think
not, but I don't know.
Regarding axles/bearings....anything I should look for?
And since we're at it... Like I said, I am new to trucks as a whole?
Besides getting a Chilton guide for this truck, is there any book that
anyone recommend I get? I don't want to be the next Dodge guru, but I
would really like to know more about my ride.
Thanks!!! >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 15, 2005 Posts: 462
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:20 am
Post subject: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
".boB" <noneofyourbusiness.DeleteThis@goaway.net> wrote in message
news:46bb2d8a$0$986$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com...
> marksegal.DeleteThis@optonline.net wrote:
>
> > It is an automatic, so no clutch. It's the same type of smell though.
> >
> > Another thing that I notice is, the heavier the payload, the less
> > travel I have on the brake pedal. I don't know if that is a safety
> > feature (reduction of brake time/making the brakes more sensitive).
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>
> Hmmm, that's a tough one. No built in safety
> feature like that.
> The only real differance between empty and loaded
> is the height of the suspension. Check and see of a
> line is pinched (doubtfull). Also check the emergency
> brake cables. See if they are getting stretched when
> loaded. That would activate the parking brake.
>
I would also look at the rear axles and bearings.
--
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 08, 2007 Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:42 am
Post subject: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Aug 9, 1:25 pm, SnoMan <ad....RemoveThis@snoman.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:20:04 -0400, "TBone" <tboneNOS....RemoveThis@nc.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >".boB" <noneofyourbusin....RemoveThis@goaway.net> wrote in message
> >news:46bb2d8a$0$986$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com...
> >> markse....RemoveThis@optonline.net wrote:
>
> >> > It is an automatic, so no clutch. It's the same type of smell though.
>
> >> > Another thing that I notice is, the heavier the payload, the less
> >> > travel I have on the brake pedal. I don't know if that is a safety
> >> > feature (reduction of brake time/making the brakes more sensitive).
>
> >> > Thanks!
>
> >> Hmmm, that's a tough one. No built in safety
> >> feature like that.
> >> The only real differance between empty and loaded
> >> is the height of the suspension. Check and see of a
> >> line is pinched (doubtfull). Also check the emergency
> >> brake cables. See if they are getting stretched when
> >> loaded. That would activate the parking brake.
>
> >I would also look at the rear axles and bearings.
>
> I would not waste time with axles and bearings. It simple sounds like
> user uses brakes aggressively and when extra weight is in the truck it
> takes more brake friction to stop it and this results in more heat
> which can overheat brakes and cause odor. The solution is get a bigger
> truck, install bigger brakes, carry less load or brake more
> conservatily when carrying extra weight. Do not waste time witch
> hunting for other problems (like axles and bearing) that is not likely
> your problem anyway because it only does it overloaded. (if bearing
> were bad and axles leaking it woul effect braking all the time.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
The user....being me...doesn't hit the breaks too hard at all when
carrying a heavy load. The last time this occurred, I was carrying no
more than about 400 1lbs in the bed. I could definitely feel the
travel reduced in the brake pedal, even with that load being what it
was.
However, to your point, I only notice the smell when I have a decent
amount of weight in the back (over a few hundred lbs). When the bed
is empty or there is minimal weight, there's no smell and brake pedal
travel seems normal. >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 20, 2005 Posts: 1001
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:20:04 -0400, "TBone" <tboneNOSPAM DeleteThis @nc.rr.com>
wrote:
>".boB" <noneofyourbusiness DeleteThis @goaway.net> wrote in message
>news:46bb2d8a$0$986$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com...
>> marksegal DeleteThis @optonline.net wrote:
>>
>> > It is an automatic, so no clutch. It's the same type of smell though.
>> >
>> > Another thing that I notice is, the heavier the payload, the less
>> > travel I have on the brake pedal. I don't know if that is a safety
>> > feature (reduction of brake time/making the brakes more sensitive).
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>>
>> Hmmm, that's a tough one. No built in safety
>> feature like that.
>> The only real differance between empty and loaded
>> is the height of the suspension. Check and see of a
>> line is pinched (doubtfull). Also check the emergency
>> brake cables. See if they are getting stretched when
>> loaded. That would activate the parking brake.
>>
>
>
>I would also look at the rear axles and bearings.
I would not waste time with axles and bearings. It simple sounds like
user uses brakes aggressively and when extra weight is in the truck it
takes more brake friction to stop it and this results in more heat
which can overheat brakes and cause odor. The solution is get a bigger
truck, install bigger brakes, carry less load or brake more
conservatily when carrying extra weight. Do not waste time witch
hunting for other problems (like axles and bearing) that is not likely
your problem anyway because it only does it overloaded. (if bearing
were bad and axles leaking it woul effect braking all the time.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 07, 2007 Posts: 46
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:54 pm
Post subject: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
> However, to your point, I only notice the smell when I have a decent
> amount of weight in the back (over a few hundred lbs). When the bed
> is empty or there is minimal weight, there's no smell and brake pedal
> travel seems normal.
I'll agree with Snoman (to a point) about suspecting the e-brake. Simple
test... with the truck loaded, jack up the rear (just one wheel if you have
an open diff - if you have a limited slip, you'll need to raise both rear
tires), and with the truck in neutral, see if the rear wheels will turn
freely.
Or, you can simply disconnect the e-brake cable at the adjuster (along the
driver's side frame rail, about half-way between the cab and the rear axle).
Loosen the adjuster nut until you can disconnect the cable. Tie it up so it
doesn't drag, and test-drive the truck. You can also crawl under the truck
and take a good look at the e-brake cable, then have a few friends jump in
the bed, and see if the cable tightens up or is otherwise fouled.
As for the comments about getting a bigger truck (no doubt with a big-block
gas engine, and super-low gearing in the rear axle), well... ignore that
part. An '02 Dak is more than capable of hauling 400lbs. of cargo.
Another thought... does your truck have a load-sensing proportioning valve?
Follow the flexible brake hose from the rear axle up to the frame rail. If
there's a valve mounted there with an arm, and a rod that runs down to the
axle, that's a proportioning valve. If you do have one, I'd also throw some
suspicion that way (and, in fact, that's the more likely culprit than an
e-brake cable getting hung up). That valve's job is to sense the amount of
weight in the bed, and allow progressively more brake pressure to the rear
brakes as the load increases. It's possible that this valve is holding
residual pressure in the system, and causing your rear brakes to drag.
Of course, if you don't have the valve described above, ignore the comment. >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 15, 2005 Posts: 462
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 11:47 am
Post subject: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
<marksegal.TakeThisOut@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:1186680172.231410.300870@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 9, 11:20 am, "TBone" <tboneNOS....TakeThisOut@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> > ".boB" <noneofyourbusin....TakeThisOut@goaway.net> wrote in message
> >
> > news:46bb2d8a$0$986$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com...
> >
> >
> >
> > > markse....TakeThisOut@optonline.net wrote:
> >
> > > > It is an automatic, so no clutch. It's the same type of smell
though.
> >
> > > > Another thing that I notice is, the heavier the payload, the less
> > > > travel I have on the brake pedal. I don't know if that is a safety
> > > > feature (reduction of brake time/making the brakes more sensitive).
> >
> > > > Thanks!
> >
> > > Hmmm, that's a tough one. No built in safety
> > > feature like that.
> > > The only real differance between empty and loaded
> > > is the height of the suspension. Check and see of a
> > > line is pinched (doubtfull). Also check the emergency
> > > brake cables. See if they are getting stretched when
> > > loaded. That would activate the parking brake.
> >
> > I would also look at the rear axles and bearings.
> >
> > --
> > If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving
>
> LOL! Love the tag at the end!
>
> I like the parking brake idea mentioned as it would fit the smell
> issue. Now I will show real ignorance here.... Would issues with the
> axles/bearings cause a smell when put under stress? I would think
> not, but I don't know.
It is not the bearings that are making the smell but if they are on the way
out, the hub could be shifting due to the weight and changing the alignment
between the drum and the shoes causing them to drag and cook. Granted, this
cousl be a real reach but it is a possibility.
>
> Regarding axles/bearings....anything I should look for?
Make sure that they still move freely and that there is no play or shifting
of the hub. I would also look for what Tom suggested because if you have
one, that would be your most likely cause of your problems.
>
> And since we're at it... Like I said, I am new to trucks as a whole?
> Besides getting a Chilton guide for this truck, is there any book that
> anyone recommend I get? I don't want to be the next Dodge guru, but I
> would really like to know more about my ride.
The Factory service manual is your best bet there. Once you learn how to
follow the damn thing, it can be your best friend when it comes to the nuts
and bolts of your vehicle.
--
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 20, 2005 Posts: 1001
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:54:11 -0400, "Tom Lawrence"
<tNoOmS4P8A8M DeleteThis @MeImNbGaArLqLmOaWiElD.com> wrote:
>As for the comments about getting a bigger truck (no doubt with a big-block
>gas engine, and super-low gearing in the rear axle), well... ignore that
>part. An '02 Dak is more than capable of hauling 400lbs. of cargo.
If this dakota has oversized tires, brake capacity is in fact reduced
and would take less weight to overload brakes. Also brakes are not
that genrous on some models because small SUV's do not have the same
federal braking standards as cars. My 89 4x4 burg has always had what
I consider to be marginal brakes since it was new. If you use brake
gentely it is not a problem but if you have to set it down hard from
speed the brakes complain.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 07, 2007 Posts: 46
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
> If this dakota has oversized tires, brake capacity is in fact reduced
So where did you read that he has oversized tires?
> federal braking standards as cars. My 89 4x4 burg has always had what
> I consider to be marginal brakes since it was new.
Yet another example from over 15 years ago.
> If you use brake gentely it is not a problem
Right - like the OP stated he did
> but if you have to set it down hard from speed the brakes complain.
And if your aunt had balls.... why don't you stop inventing all kinds of
scenarios, and stick to the facts? This is the second time you've
recommended that someone tradein their vehicle. The first was someone with
a bad rear wheel speed sensor, and now it's a guy with a 1/2-ton truck
trying to haul 400lbs. of cargo.
And you wonder why you're held in such contempt around here?? >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 22, 2007 Posts: 259
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 4:34 pm
Post subject: Re: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Tom Lawrence" <tNoOmS4P8A8M RemoveThis @MeImNbGaArLqLmOaWiElD.com> wrote in message
news:46bcbedc$0$79241$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
>> If this dakota has oversized tires, brake capacity is in fact reduced
>
> So where did you read that he has oversized tires?
>
>> federal braking standards as cars. My 89 4x4 burg has always had what
>> I consider to be marginal brakes since it was new.
>
> Yet another example from over 15 years ago.
Okay! Ya both have me on this. WTF is a "burg"?? >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 20, 2005 Posts: 1001
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Re: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:39:06 -0400, "Tom Lawrence"
<tNoOmS4P8A8M RemoveThis @MeImNbGaArLqLmOaWiElD.com> wrote:
>> If this dakota has oversized tires, brake capacity is in fact reduced
>
>So where did you read that he has oversized tires?
>
>> federal braking standards as cars. My 89 4x4 burg has always had what
>> I consider to be marginal brakes since it was new.
>
>Yet another example from over 15 years ago.
You realy act like a child somethimes looking to start something
>
>> If you use brake gentely it is not a problem
>
>Right - like the OP stated he did
And....
>
>> but if you have to set it down hard from speed the brakes complain.
>
>And if your aunt had balls.... why don't you stop inventing all kinds of
>scenarios, and stick to the facts? This is the second time you've
>recommended that someone tradein their vehicle. The first was someone with
>a bad rear wheel speed sensor, and now it's a guy with a 1/2-ton truck
>trying to haul 400lbs. of cargo.
Toadya trcks are more car than truck so do not even start to argue
with me that it is built tough and 400 lbs is a piece of cake for it
>
>And you wonder why you're held in such contempt around here??
I am held in contempt by insecure persons like yourself that are
offended when somebody goes against their current. Some like you never
seem to grow up.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 22, 2007 Posts: 259
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Re: Re: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"SnoMan" <admin.TakeThisOut@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:k6jpb39q93t5ap0nj93r9nvbcv0k4aina0@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:39:06 -0400, "Tom Lawrence"
> <tNoOmS4P8A8M.TakeThisOut@MeImNbGaArLqLmOaWiElD.com> wrote:
>
>>> If this dakota has oversized tires, brake capacity is in fact reduced
>>
>>So where did you read that he has oversized tires?
>>
>>> federal braking standards as cars. My 89 4x4 burg has always had what
>>> I consider to be marginal brakes since it was new.
>>
>>Yet another example from over 15 years ago.
>
> You realy act like a child somethimes looking to start something
>
>>
>>> If you use brake gentely it is not a problem
>>
>>Right - like the OP stated he did
>
> And....
>
>>
>>> but if you have to set it down hard from speed the brakes complain.
>>
>>And if your aunt had balls.... why don't you stop inventing all kinds of
>>scenarios, and stick to the facts? This is the second time you've
>>recommended that someone tradein their vehicle. The first was someone
>>with
>>a bad rear wheel speed sensor, and now it's a guy with a 1/2-ton truck
>>trying to haul 400lbs. of cargo.
>
> Toadya trcks are more car than truck so do not even start to argue
> with me that it is built tough and 400 lbs is a piece of cake for it
>
>>
>>And you wonder why you're held in such contempt around here??
>
> I am held in contempt by insecure persons like yourself that are
> offended when somebody goes against their current.
You are held in contempt by people in every news group you post on! Why?
Because you have a history of posting dangerous information, wrong
information, outdated information and just plan mindnumbing nonsense.
Now WTF is a "burg"??????????????????? >> Stay informed about: 2002 Dakota heavy payload brake smell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | 2002 Dakota RT p/win switches - The power window and locks switches on my 2002 Dak RT look like they will snap out of the door panal, as a unit, without removing the panel. True? False? If true, where do I pry so that I don't break something?? Thanks "Leroy"
electric brake controller 2001 Dodge dakota - Hello, I am trying to wire a electric brake controller into my 2001 Dodge Dakota Quadcab and I DON'T have the towing package. I have run a blue wire from my 7 pin round connector in the back to the engine bay but I have to problems I need help with: 1.....
'04 Dakota blowing brake light fuse daily! - HELP! My 2004 Dakota Quad Cab, 4.7ltr. V8, 5Spd Auto with A/C, Trailer Tow Group (34K miles) has been popping "stop lamp" or brake light fuses every day for a few weeks now and I cannot locate the source of the trouble. Here's what I've done: ...
It is with a heavy heart that I must report........ - It is with a heavy heart that I report the untimely passing of our dear friend and AADT know-it-all Snow Man. Snow was killed in a testing mishap while reviewing a new product used to decorate the interiors of dodge trucks. We had asked Mr. Man to..
Light Duty vs Heavy Duty parts? - Slightly confused on this issue.
Are LD and HD trucks based on model designations like, Dakota and
1500 are LD, 2500 and 3500 are HD or does this have more to do with
various options available on any truck like Engine/transmission/axle
ratios or is it.... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|