2001 Chevy 350 / 5.7

> It was available in box van and passenger van lines (Express)... not in the
> 1500, 2500 or 2500 truck line in these years.

Augustus, This guy was told the exact same thing by me in the Dodge
truck group, but didn't listen then. I wouldn't waste your time.
 >> Stay informed about: 2001 Chevy 350 / 5.7 

On Nov 19, 6:40 pm, Picasso <Pica....DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote:
> azwiley1 wrote:
> >> It was available in box van and passenger van lines (Express)... not in the
> >> 1500, 2500 or 2500 truck line in these years.
>
> > Augustus, This guy was told the exact same thing by me in the Dodge
> > truck group, but didn't listen then. I wouldn't waste your time.
>
> i didn't realize i posted it to the wrong group buddy, sorry.

It wasn't an issue about posting it to the "wrong group" it was simply
that you had asked for info about a subject and you were provided the
correct info and as it seemed, felt that it was wrong. (this
impression was based off your follow up post)

As I state there, and Augustus stated above, that engine was not
available in that year truck, they stopped that mid year 99 with the
possibility of some carry over into 00.
 >> Stay informed about: 2001 Chevy 350 / 5.7 

azwiley1 wrote:
>> It was available in box van and passenger van lines (Express)... not in the
>> 1500, 2500 or 2500 truck line in these years.
>
> Augustus, This guy was told the exact same thing by me in the Dodge
> truck group, but didn't listen then. I wouldn't waste your time.

i didn't realize i posted it to the wrong group buddy, sorry.
 >> Stay informed about: 2001 Chevy 350 / 5.7 

azwiley1 wrote:
> On Nov 19, 6:40 pm, Picasso <Pica....RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> azwiley1 wrote:
>>>> It was available in box van and passenger van lines (Express)... not in the
>>>> 1500, 2500 or 2500 truck line in these years.
>>> Augustus, This guy was told the exact same thing by me in the Dodge
>>> truck group, but didn't listen then. I wouldn't waste your time.
>> i didn't realize i posted it to the wrong group buddy, sorry.
>
> It wasn't an issue about posting it to the "wrong group" it was simply
> that you had asked for info about a subject and you were provided the
> correct info and as it seemed, felt that it was wrong. (this
> impression was based off your follow up post)
>
> As I state there, and Augustus stated above, that engine was not
> available in that year truck, they stopped that mid year 99 with the
> possibility of some carry over into 00.

that being said, the 5.3 is a stronger engine and seems to be marginally
better on fuel.
 >> Stay informed about: 2001 Chevy 350 / 5.7 

"Augustus" <no_one.RemoveThis@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:8y80j.17234$Zn.6734@edtnps90...
>
> "Picasso" <Picasso.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4740f1d8$0$5260$9a566e8b@news.aliant.net...
>> Saw a 2001 chevy advertised as having a 350 / 5.7... is this true??? This
>> is exactly how it was advertised
>>
>> I thought 98 (or maybe 99) was the last year for these motors.
>>
>> It could be just like people advertising the engines as Vortex rather
>> than Vortec...
>
> It was available in box van and passenger van lines (Express)... not in
> the 1500, 2500 or 2500 truck line in these years.
>
I have a 2000 HD C2500 with a Vortec 5.7 350 4L80E combo so they were
available in 2000 at least.
Steve
 >> Stay informed about: 2001 Chevy 350 / 5.7