"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr RemoveThis @verizon.net> wrote in message
news:AWuhj.11547$qV.5342@trnddc03...
>
> "jimboc via CarKB.com" <u40498@uwe> wrote in message
> news:7e035791a816f@uwe...
>>i just spoke with the actual technician how will keep the car
>>overnight
>> sometime next week and do what he can to diagnose my problem.
>> During our conversation he these cars don't have Valve Stem Seal
>> problems,
>> that the PCV Valves never go bad and if there was a hole in the
>> Head Gasket
>> he would have noticed it last week when he had 20 lbs. of pressure
>> on the
>> cooling system for 8 hours.
>> so i think leaving it with him overnight, with my figures crossed,
>> is the
>> next step to take.
>> let you know what happens late next week.
>>
>> thanks for your help!
>>
>
>
> You just brought is back to STEAM on start-up.
>
> Have you ever noticed steam/smoke coming from the tail pipe of cars
> pulling out of a neighborhood in the morning as you drive past on
> the artery street/road? This is normal, and by your first post, I
> think this is what is coming from your Expedition.
>
> Your Expedition has either the 4.6L or the 5.4L motor, and according
> to the data I have are the same motor with different stroke. (the
> diameter of the bore is the same, so the difference in displacement
> has to come from stroke.) I am new to this power plant, and I've not
> heard that there is any problem associated with valve seals. Your
> mechanic appears to hold the same knowledge.
The 5.4L has a different block with more deck height and a longer
stroke. Heads are interchangeable with the 4.6L. Basic engine layout
is the same. Unfortunately I have heard more than one complaint of
blue smoke at start-up. If you want the opinion of a lot of Expedition
owners, I'd suggest that you join the Expedition Owner's Mailing List
(see
http://mail.xpog.com/mailman/listinfo/expedition ). I no longer
own an Expedition, but in the past I have owned two, a 1997 (149,000
miles) and a 2003 (100,000 miles). I never had any problems with oil
smoke, but the 1997 did consume a slight amount of oil (a quart or so
per 4000 miles).
One thing to consider - In the old days, blue, or blue-gray smoke at
start-up, that went away in minute or two, was always considered an
indicator of leaky valve stem seals. But today, because of catalytic
converters, almost anything that will cause slight oil smoking will
exhibit the same characteristics (i.e., it stops shortly after the
engine is started). Once the catalytic converter is warmed up, it will
"eat" any slight oil smoke. So it is possible that the cause is
completely unrelated to the valve seals and that the slight blue smoke
goes away after the engine runs briefly because the catalytic
converter has started working.
I had a friend who had a 4.6L Expedition that had the slight amount of
blue smoke at startup and the dealer never could fix it. The did
everything short of replacing the engine - which they probably should
have done. My friend is driving a GMC SUV now.
I'd suggest that the OP monitor his oil usage carefully. I also think
the comment that PCV valves never go bad is bogus. If they never go
bad, why does Ford replace them for free at 60,000 miles (read your
warranty). My 1997 was particularly bad about coating the throttle
bore with oil gunky residue. That stuff was not coming into the engine
through the air filter - it was coming in via the PCV system. It is
the same stuff that gums up IAC valves. I wonder if you disconnected
the PCV feed to the intake manifold what would happen to the smoke.
Ed
>> Stay informed about: 2000 Expedition smokes at startup